🗞️ Why in News India’s crypto market is shifting from the speculative surge of 2021 towards more systematic, long-term investing, visible in the rapid growth of crypto Systematic Investment Plans (SIPs). More than ₹51,000 crore of crypto investment took place in India in 2024-25, the latest year for which data exists. The sector remains unregulated, and both SEBI and the RBI say they await a government decision on whether crypto is a currency or an asset.

What a Crypto SIP Is, and How It Differs

A Systematic Investment Plan commits a fixed sum at regular intervals rather than a lump sum at one moment. Its purpose is rupee cost averaging: buying more units when prices fall and fewer when they rise, which lowers the average acquisition cost over time and removes the need to time the market.

The mechanics on a crypto platform differ from a mutual fund auto-pay, and the distinction matters.

Mutual fund SIP Crypto SIP as described by Indian platforms
Source of funds Auto-debit from the investor’s bank account each month A lump sum pre-deposited on the platform, from which the monthly amount is drawn
What the investor holds Units of a regulated, SEBI-supervised scheme The crypto asset itself, deposited to the user’s wallet each month
Regulator SEBI None

As explained by Mudrex, a user may deposit ₹1 lakh on a platform and set a monthly SIP of ₹10,000 debited from that balance, with the corresponding crypto asset credited to the wallet each month.

The point an exam answer must make. A SIP is a disciplined purchasing method, not a risk-reduction product. It averages the entry price of a volatile asset; it does nothing about the volatility, the custody risk, or the absence of a regulator. Applying a familiar and trusted retail wrapper to an unregulated asset can create an impression of safety that the underlying product does not carry.

The Growth the Exchanges Report

Because the sector is unregulated, no official industry-wide data exists. The following figures are as reported by the exchanges themselves and should be attributed accordingly.

Platform Reported trend
CoinDCX (Mridul Gupta, founding partner) About 20 per cent of those previously investing in a single asset such as Bitcoin now choose crypto SIPs, up from 2 to 4 per cent nine months earlier. Daily SIP creation up 50 to 60 per cent in the last three to six months.
Mudrex (Prateek Gupta, head of business) Assets under management via the SIP route grew about 220 per cent, close to three times, over 12 to 18 months.
CoinSwitch (Balaji Srihari, VP India Business) Between 2023-24 and 2025-26, active SIP users grew about 75 per cent and the number of active SIPs about 93 per cent.

Who Is Investing

Age group Share of crypto SIP users (CoinSwitch)
26 to 35 42 to 44 per cent (largest segment)
36 to 45 28 to 31 per cent
18 to 25 14 to 16 per cent
46 and above 12 to 13 per cent

Two findings cut against the stereotype. First, the dominant cohort is not the youngest. CoinDCX describes “a lot of disciplined investment from a more mature audience now versus a GenZ kind of an audience”. Second, the geography has widened well past the metros: Mudrex reported participation from towns “not even like Tier 2, they are Tier 10”.

The Regulatory Position

India has taxed crypto without legalising, regulating or banning it. That is the defining feature of the Indian approach and the source of most confusion.

What exists

Instrument Provision
Section 115BBH, Income Tax Act Flat 30 per cent tax on gains from transfer of a Virtual Digital Asset, plus surcharge and 4 per cent cess
Section 194S, Income Tax Act 1 per cent TDS on payment for transfer of a VDA above ₹50,000 for specified persons and ₹10,000 for others
Deductions Only the cost of acquisition. No deduction for infrastructure, interest or other expenses
Loss set-off Not permitted, not even against gains on a different digital asset, and no carry-forward
Holding period No distinction between short-term and long-term capital gains
PMLA, March 2023 VDA service providers designated Reporting Entities under the Prevention of Money-Laundering Act, making FIU-IND registration mandatory

As of July 2026, 54 crypto exchanges and VDA service providers were registered with FIU-IND, including CoinDCX, WazirX, ZebPay, CoinSwitch and Mudrex, alongside international platforms such as Binance that registered after initially being blocked. Enforcement has been active: show-cause notices to nine offshore exchanges in December 2023, Section 13 PMLA notices to 25 more in late 2025, and about ₹28 crore in penalties across FY24 and FY25.

What does not exist

There is no securities-style regulator, no investor protection framework, no disclosure regime and no compensation mechanism. A senior SEBI official told The Hindu: “We have been looking at crypto and the changes happening, but until the government decides whether it wants to classify cryptos as currencies or assets, there is little that we can do on this.” RBI officials said their stance on private cryptocurrencies is unchanged.

Why the classification question is not a technicality. If a crypto asset is a security, SEBI regulates it, and issuers owe disclosure and prospectus obligations. If it is a currency, the RBI’s domain and the FEMA framework apply. If it is a commodity, a third regime applies. Until the category is fixed, no regulator has jurisdiction, and the AML framework under the PMLA operates alone. That is the gap: India polices crypto for money laundering while leaving the investor unprotected against everything else.

UPSC Relevance

GS Paper 3. Indian economy: mobilisation of resources, growth and development; inclusive growth; money and banking; awareness in the field of IT.

The Mains framing. The productive line is that India has built an enforcement architecture without a regulatory architecture. The tax regime is deliberately punitive, designed to discourage rather than to nurture; the PMLA designation addresses the state’s money-laundering concern; the CBDC is the RBI’s sovereign alternative. What is missing is any framework addressed to the retail investor’s interest. Meanwhile the market has continued to grow, has spread beyond the metros, and has adopted the vocabulary of mainstream retail finance, which raises the cost of continued regulatory silence.

A question worth preparing. “India taxes virtual digital assets heavily and brings their service providers under anti-money-laundering law, but has neither regulated nor prohibited them. Examine the consequences of this position for retail investors and for financial stability. (250 words)”

International context for a stronger answer. The G20 New Delhi Declaration (2023) endorsed the IMF-FSB Synthesis Paper roadmap on crypto assets, which recommends against a blanket ban and in favour of comprehensive regulation, and India’s chairmanship pushed for a coordinated global approach rather than fragmented national rules.

📌 Facts Corner — Knowledgepedia

Prelims, statement-ready facts:

  • More than ₹51,000 crore of crypto investment took place in India in 2024-25, the latest year for which data is available.
  • India’s crypto sector is unregulated, so no official industry-wide data exists.
  • Section 115BBH of the Income Tax Act imposes a flat 30 per cent tax on gains from the transfer of Virtual Digital Assets, plus surcharge and 4 per cent cess.
  • Section 194S imposes 1 per cent TDS on payment for transfer of a VDA above ₹50,000 for specified persons and ₹10,000 for others.
  • Only the cost of acquisition is deductible; losses cannot be set off against any other income, including gains on other digital assets, and cannot be carried forward.
  • The VDA tax regime makes no distinction between short-term and long-term holdings.
  • In March 2023, VDA service providers were designated Reporting Entities under the Prevention of Money-Laundering Act, making FIU-IND registration mandatory.
  • As of July 2026, 54 crypto exchanges and VDA service providers were registered with FIU-IND.
  • FIU-IND issued show-cause notices to nine offshore exchanges in December 2023 and Section 13 PMLA notices to 25 more in late 2025, with about ₹28 crore in penalties across FY24 and FY25.
  • The 26 to 35 age group forms the largest segment of crypto SIP users at about 42 to 44 per cent, per CoinSwitch.
  • SEBI has said it cannot act until the government classifies crypto as a currency or an asset; the RBI’s stance on private cryptocurrencies is unchanged.
  • The G20 New Delhi Declaration of 2023 endorsed the IMF-FSB Synthesis Paper roadmap on crypto assets.

Prelims, the traps:

  • Crypto is neither legal tender nor banned in India. It is taxed and its service providers are covered by anti-money-laundering law. “Legalised” and “regulated” are both incorrect descriptions.
  • A crypto SIP is not a mutual fund SIP. There is no scheme, no fund manager, no SEBI supervision, and the debit is from a balance pre-deposited on the platform rather than from a bank account.
  • The digital rupee, the RBI’s CBDC, is a sovereign liability and is not a cryptocurrency. Conflating the two is a standard error.
  • The 1 per cent TDS under Section 194S is not the tax; it is a withholding mechanism. The tax is 30 per cent under Section 115BBH.
  • Exchange-reported growth figures are company disclosures, not official statistics.

Source: Crypto SIPs and the Maturing of India's Retail Digital Asset Market — Ujiyari.com | Free UPSC & State PCS Current Affairs