The Lift Line

“Crucially, resolving these operational bottlenecks would benefit domestic enterprises as much as foreign investors.” (Bharat Joshi, The Hindu)

Why This Editorial Matters for Your Exam

This op-ed in The Hindu of 9 October 2026 is by Bharat Joshi, Director of ACTL, a logistics company, and CEO of J Curve Ventures, an advisory firm. It takes a headline every aspirant will see, record foreign direct investment (FDI), and asks the harder question: why does committed investment take so long to become factories and data centres? Joshi’s answer is that India’s remaining “negotiations” are internal: between the Centre and the States, between Ministries, and between rules on paper and rules in force.

That makes it a ready-made map of the investment climate for GS3, touching five topics you study separately: the labour codes, Quality Control Orders (QCOs), commercial courts and mediation, retrospective tax, and investment treaties. For context, this site discussed QCOs on intermediate inputs on 24 September and India’s Model Bilateral Investment Treaty (BIT) on 3 October; this piece supplies the context that connects them.

GS Paper 3: Indian economy and issues relating to mobilisation of resources, growth and development; investment models; effects of liberalisation on the economy. GS Paper 2: Bilateral agreements affecting India’s interests; federal relations.

New to this topic? Start here: the basics in plain words (revision card 1 of 8)
Revision card 1 of 8 · Start here
New to this topic? The basics in plain words
Read this first; the other cards are at the end of the article
Foreign direct investment (FDI) is money from abroad invested in businesses in India, such as factories and data centres. Joshi's point: India now attracts record FDI, but committed money takes time to become a working project.
From commitment to deployment (as Joshi describes it)
An investor commits money
→
Ministries and the DPIIT give approvals
→
Central and State rules apply
→
Disputes go to courts or arbitration
→
A greenfield project starts working
The real question
India ranks 11th among FDI destinations, Joshi notes. So why does committed investment lag? His answer: the remaining negotiations are internal, between the Centre and the States and between Ministries.
Who decides: the DPIIT is the nodal agency, but line Ministries take many approval decisions, and States make rules under the labour codes because labour is in the Concurrent List.
Jargon buster
Greenfield a new project built from scratch
QCO Quality Control Order: makes BIS certification mandatory
Concurrent List subjects on which both the Centre and the States can act
TEPA India's trade pact with the four EFTA states

Background and Context

The headline numbers (as Joshi cites them)

Indicator Figure Source Joshi cites
Gross inward FDI, FY26 Record $94.5 billion (Joshi gives $94.8 billion) RBI Annual Report 2025-26
India’s rank among top FDI destinations 11th, after a 44% rise in inflows UNCTAD, World Investment Report 2026
Greenfield data-centre investment, first three quarters of 2025 India about $7 billion (top 10, behind Thailand and Spain) UNCTAD report
The same, for comparison South Korea $21 billion; United States $29 billion; France $69 billion UNCTAD report

Gross is not net. “Gross inward FDI” counts the money coming in. Net figures subtract money taken out, so a question that quotes one cannot be answered with the other. Check which measure a source uses.

The four labour codes

For background: according to the Press Information Bureau (PIB), the four codes came into force on 21 November 2025, rationalising 29 existing labour laws:

Code Year
Code on Wages 2019
Industrial Relations Code 2020
Code on Social Security 2020
Occupational Safety, Health and Working Conditions Code 2020

PIB also records that “Labour” as a subject is in the Concurrent List of the Constitution, and that under the codes the power to make rules rests with both the Central Government and the State Governments. That is the hinge of Joshi’s labour argument: the codes bite on the ground only as each State notifies its rules.

The India-EFTA TEPA

For context, the India-EFTA Trade and Economic Partnership Agreement (TEPA) entered into force on 1 October 2025. According to PIB, it includes an investment objective of USD 100 billion over 15 years and the facilitation of one million direct jobs in India, with wider market access across the four EFTA states: Switzerland, Norway, Iceland and Liechtenstein.

The Analysis

Joshi’s argument moves from the headline to the bottlenecks, then to the lessons.

1. The headline is strong. After the 18th BRICS Summit in New Delhi in September, and ahead of the Prime Minister’s planned December visits to Canada and Brussels, where Joshi writes that free trade agreements “are expected to be signed”, India’s trade push and domestic reforms have changed its investment trajectory.

2. But deployment lags. Globally, international project finance remains roughly a quarter below its 2021 peak, and India reflects the trend. In greenfield data centres, India’s roughly $7 billion trailed several peers. Joshi’s question: what creates this lag between committed investment and its actual deployment?

3. The remaining negotiations are internal. They run between the Centre and the States, between the Department for Promotion of Industry and Internal Trade (DPIIT) and line Ministries, and between central rules and the State notifications needed to enforce them. Fixing them helps domestic firms as much as foreign ones.

4. Contract enforcement. Courts still had nearly 48 million pending cases as of April, including about six million in High Courts. The Commercial Courts Act, 2015 and the Mediation Act, 2023 have helped, and institutional arbitration is becoming the corporate default, but smaller enterprises still rely on courts. Joshi wants better-staffed commercial benches and mediation centres.

5. Labour codes in transition. Parliament consolidated 29 central labour laws into four codes, and Joshi writes that the Central Rules were notified in May 2026. Because labour is on the Concurrent List, implementation depends on State notifications: Gujarat has notified rules under all four codes, while other industrial States are still finalising theirs. A firm with a national human-resources framework must manage varied State timelines.

6. Tax certainty. Joshi credits the Taxation Laws (Amendment) Act, 2021 with ending “the ghost of retrospective tax disputes” by withdrawing outstanding demands against entities such as Vodafone and Cairn Energy, and the relaunched Vivad se Vishwas scheme with reducing the direct-tax litigation backlog.

7. Compliance overreach. Mandatory Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS) certification under QCOs was meant to protect consumers, but the framework expanded. Joshi cites the Gauba Committee: QCOs grew from fewer than 70 to nearly 790, covering raw materials and intermediate goods. For imported components, compliance costs rose to Rs 20 lakh, with certification taking six to eight months and disrupting MSME supply chains. The government responded by withdrawing QCOs on critical intermediate goods, including PVC, aluminium and zinc.

8. Targets without protection. Modern trade pacts now carry binding investment targets, such as the EFTA agreement’s $100 billion. But because TEPA “lacks an independent bilateral investment dispute mechanism”, Joshi notes, Switzerland is separately negotiating a bilateral investment treaty, which “could inform negotiations with the EU and the U.K.”

9. Uneven speed. The DPIIT is the nodal agency but not the decision-maker on approvals. A revised standard operating procedure issued in May 2026 sets a 12-week deadline, but compliance is uneven. Large projects such as Tata Electronics’ semiconductor facility at Dholera, Gujarat show what coordination can do.

10. Lessons from success. Singapore’s Comprehensive Economic Cooperation Agreement (CECA) has, Joshi writes, facilitated over $195 billion in cumulative FDI since 2000 (DPIIT puts cumulative FDI from Singapore at $194.68 billion for April 2000 to March 2026), and its non-discrimination and investor-protection frameworks are a blueprint for treaties. At home, mobile-phone production has grown 33-fold since FY15, from Rs 180 billion to Rs 6.27 trillion, with exports of Rs 2.59 trillion; India is now the world’s second-largest mobile-phone manufacturer by volume and meets 99.2% of domestic demand locally.

Joshi concludes that India’s rise to 11th place among FDI destinations reflects its resolve to tackle internal governance bottlenecks, and that sustained institutional reform and free trade will keep paying off.

Data and Institutions Vault

Prelims-grade facts:

  • Four labour codes (background): in force since 21 November 2025, per PIB; together they rationalise 29 labour laws.
  • The four codes: Code on Wages, 2019; Industrial Relations Code, 2020; Code on Social Security, 2020; Occupational Safety, Health and Working Conditions Code, 2020.
  • Labour is a Concurrent List subject; under the codes, both the Centre and the States make rules.
  • India-EFTA TEPA (background): in force since 1 October 2025; investment objective of USD 100 billion over 15 years; one million direct jobs.
  • EFTA = Switzerland, Norway, Iceland, Liechtenstein.
  • DPIIT: Department for Promotion of Industry and Internal Trade; the nodal agency for FDI, though not the final decision-maker on approvals (Joshi).
  • QCOs: make BIS certification mandatory for notified products. Gauba Committee count, as Joshi cites it: fewer than 70 grew to nearly 790.
  • Dispute-resolution laws Joshi names: Commercial Courts Act, 2015; Mediation Act, 2023.
  • Retrospective tax: Taxation Laws (Amendment) Act, 2021 withdrew outstanding demands (Vodafone, Cairn Energy), as Joshi notes.
  • UNCTAD’s World Investment Report 2026 ranks India 11th among FDI destinations (Joshi’s citation).

⚠️ Watch the trap: TEPA is with EFTA, the four-nation European Free Trade Association, not the European Union. Its USD 100 billion is an investment objective over 15 years, not a trade target. And because labour is in the Concurrent List, a code in force nationally still needs State rules to work on the ground.

The Debate

Joshi’s case. India has done the hard legislative work: labour codes, an end to retrospective tax, commercial courts, trade pacts with investment targets. What slows deployment now is coordination: State rules that lag central ones, Ministries that hold approvals the nodal department cannot force, courts that small firms cannot avoid, and certification rules that grew beyond their purpose. Fixing these benefits Indian firms as much as foreign ones.

The other side. Some of these frictions are features, not bugs. QCOs exist, as Joshi acknowledges, to safeguard consumers, and cheap imported inputs of uncertain quality carry their own costs. Divergent State labour rules are what the Concurrent List allows: States can adapt rules to local labour markets, and a single national template would cut against federalism. Strong investor-protection clauses in treaties can expose India to arbitration claims that constrain its right to regulate, which is why India’s 2015 Model BIT (background in our 3 October piece) was cautious. And a target written into a trade pact is an objective, not money in the ground.

The balanced verdict. The aim is not to remove every rule but to make each rule predictable and proportionate: consumer-safety QCOs targeted at finished goods rather than critical inputs, State labour rules notified on a known timetable, approval deadlines enforced across Ministries, and treaty protections that reassure investors while preserving regulatory space. Predictability, more than any single concession, is what turns commitment into deployment.

How to Think About This

Use a “commitment to deployment” lens. A headline FDI figure measures money pledged or arriving; the economy gains only when that money becomes a working plant. Between the two sit four checkpoints you can list in any answer: approvals (who decides, and how fast), rules (central and State, in force or pending), contracts (how quickly disputes are settled) and protection (what the investor can do if the state changes course). Joshi’s piece walks through all four. In Mains, name the checkpoint, give one example from this piece, and propose one fix.

Diagram-in-Words

Argument map

From commitment to deployment: Joshi’s argument

Record FDI is the headline; the bottlenecks that slow deployment are internal, and past successes show the fix.

$94.5 billion record gross inward FDI in FY26 (RBI Annual Report) 11th among top FDI destinations, after a 44% rise (UNCTAD) But deployment lags data centres: India about $7 billion vs France $69 billion (first three quarters of 2025) Courts nearly 48 million pending cases as of April Labour rules Concurrent List: codes wait for State rules QCOs fewer than 70 grew to nearly 790 the internal bottlenecks Investor protection TEPA: a $100 billion target, no independent bilateral investment dispute mechanism Approvals DPIIT is nodal, not the decision-maker; 12-week SOP unevenly met Singapore CECA nearly $195 billion cumulative FDI since 2000 Mobile phones production up 33-fold since FY15; second-largest maker by volume what works Joshi’s fix staff commercial benches and mediation; align State rules; recalibrate QCOs; protect investors in treaties; enforce approval deadlines
Joshi’s chain of reasoning: the remaining negotiations are internal, and fixing them helps domestic firms as much as foreign investors.

Takeaway Box

  • Core idea: India has won headline FDI; deployment now depends on internal coordination, Joshi argues.
  • Know the anchors: four labour codes (in force since 21 November 2025; 29 laws); labour in the Concurrent List; India-EFTA TEPA (USD 100 billion over 15 years); DPIIT; QCOs and BIS certification.
  • Know the bottlenecks: State labour rules, Ministry approvals, court pendency, QCO compliance, investor-protection gaps.
  • Mains use: GS3 investment models and liberalisation; GS2 bilateral agreements and federal relations.

Revision Cards

Swipe for cards 2 to 8 →Card 1, the basics, is near the top
Revision card 2 of 8 · Revise
Inbound investment at a glance
The Hindu op-ed, 9 October 2026 · GS3 Economy
In one line: India has won headline FDI, Joshi argues; turning commitments into projects now depends on fixing internal bottlenecks.
The headline numbers Joshi cites
IndicatorFigureGross inward FDI, FY26A record: $94.8 billion as Joshi gives it; $94.5 billion in the RBI Annual ReportRank among FDI destinations (UNCTAD)11th, after a 44% riseGreenfield data centres, first three quarters of 2025India about $7 billion; France $69 billion
Two facts to quote
21 November 2025 the four labour codes came into force, rationalising 29 labour laws (PIB)
USD 100 billion India-EFTA TEPA's investment objective, over 15 years (PIB)
In plain words: the money is arriving; the delays come from inside the system, so the fixes are about coordination: courts, State labour rules, QCOs, approvals and investor protection.
UjiyariThe five internal bottlenecks: card 3 →
Revision card 3 of 8 · The argument
The five internal bottlenecks
Why committed investment lags, as Joshi argues
The internal bottlenecks (Joshi's case)
Courts nearly 48 million pending cases as of April; smaller enterprises still rely on courts
→
Labour rules labour is in the Concurrent List, so the codes wait for State notifications
→
QCOs grew from fewer than 70 to nearly 790 (Joshi, citing the Gauba Committee), covering raw materials and intermediate goods
→
Investor protection TEPA lacks an independent bilateral investment dispute mechanism
→
Approvals the DPIIT is the nodal agency but not the decision-maker; the 12-week SOP is unevenly met
The cost of compliance (Joshi's figures)
Rs 20 lakh compliance costs for imported components under QCOs
6 to 8 months certification timelines that disrupted MSME supply chains
UjiyariLessons and the other side: card 4 →
Revision card 4 of 8 · The argument
Lessons from success, and the other side
What works, and why some frictions exist
Lessons Joshi draws (what coordinated policy achieves)
Singapore CECA nearly $195 billion in cumulative FDI, April 2000 to March 2026; a blueprint for investor protection
→
Mobile phones production up 33-fold since FY15, from Rs 180 billion to Rs 6.27 trillion
→
Tax certainty the Taxation Laws (Amendment) Act, 2021 withdrew retrospective demands against Vodafone and Cairn Energy
The other side. QCOs were designed to safeguard consumers. Divergent State labour rules are what the Concurrent List allows. Strong investor-protection clauses can constrain the state's right to regulate. And a target in a trade pact is an objective, not money in the ground.
In plain words: make each rule predictable and proportionate rather than removing rules; predictability turns commitment into deployment.
UjiyariThe static base: card 5 →
Revision card 5 of 8 · The static base
The background UPSC asks about
Labour codes, the Concurrent List, TEPA and the laws Joshi names · GS3 static portion
The law (what governs investment here)
Labour: a Concurrent List subject; under the codes, both the Centre and the States make rules
India-EFTA TEPA: investment objective of USD 100 billion over 15 years; one million direct jobs
EFTA: Switzerland, Norway, Iceland, Liechtenstein
Commercial Courts Act, 2015 and Mediation Act, 2023: the dispute-resolution laws Joshi names
The four labour codes
CodeYearCode on Wages2019Industrial Relations Code2020Code on Social Security2020Occupational Safety, Health and Working Conditions Code2020
From 2015 to 2026
2015Commercial Courts Act2021Taxation Laws (Amendment) Act ends retrospective tax demands2025TEPA in force from 1 October 2025; four labour codes in force from 21 November 20252026May: Central Rules and a revised DPIIT SOP, as Joshi notes
UjiyariTest yourself on card 6 →
Revision card 6 of 8 · Test yourself
Prelims practice, UPSC pattern
Choose an option, then tap Show answer
Q1. Consider the following statements about the four labour codes:
1.They came into force on 21 November 2025.
2.Together they rationalise 29 existing labour laws.
3.Because labour is in the Union List, only the Central Government makes rules under them.
How many of the statements given above are correct?
(a) Only one(b) Only two(c) All three(d) None
Show answer
Answer: (b) Statements 1 and 2 are correct. Statement 3 is wrong: labour is in the Concurrent List, and under the codes both the Centre and the States make rules.
Q2. With reference to the India-EFTA Trade and Economic Partnership Agreement (TEPA), consider the following statements:
1.It came into force on 1 October 2025.
2.It includes an investment objective of USD 100 billion over 15 years.
3.The European Union is a party to it as a bloc.
Which of the statements given above are correct?
(a) 2 and 3 only(b) 1 and 3 only(c) 1 and 2 only(d) 1, 2 and 3
Show answer
Answer: (c) Statements 1 and 2 are correct. Statement 3 is wrong: TEPA is with EFTA, whose members are Switzerland, Norway, Iceland and Liechtenstein, not with the European Union.
Q3. Consider the following statements:
Statement-I: Joshi argues that firms with national human-resources frameworks face varied State timelines under the labour codes.
Statement-II: Labour is in the Concurrent List, so implementation of the codes depends on State notifications.
Which one of the following is correct?
(a) Both correct; II explains I(b) Both correct; II does not explain I(c) I correct, II incorrect(d) I incorrect, II correct
Show answer
Answer: (a) Both are correct, and II explains I: because States make their own rules under the codes, firms operating nationally must track each State's timeline.
UjiyariWatch the trap: card 7 →
Revision card 7 of 8 · Remember
Watch the trap: recall and data to quote
Cover the green side, then tap a question to check yourself
Prelims traps
TEPA is with the European Union
TEPA is with EFTA: Switzerland, Norway, Iceland, Liechtenstein
USD 100 billion is a trade target
It is an investment objective over 15 years
Labour is a Union List subject
Labour is in the Concurrent List; States make rules too
Gross inward FDI is the same as net FDI
Net figures subtract money taken out
Quick recall
R1How many labour laws do the four codes rationalise?
29
R2Whose count put QCOs at nearly 790?
The Gauba Committee, as Joshi cites it
R3Which department is the nodal agency for investment approvals?
The DPIIT
Value addition (lift the answer)
Mobile phones: India is the second-largest mobile-phone manufacturer by volume and meets 99.2% of domestic demand locally (Joshi's figures)
Gujarat has notified rules under all four labour codes, Joshi notes, while other industrial States are still finalising theirs
Memory hooks (for first-timers)
4 codes, 29 laws Wages in 2019; the other three in 2020
100 over 15 TEPA's USD 100 billion investment objective spans 15 years
UjiyariWrite the Mains answer on card 8 →
Revision card 8 of 8 · Write
Mains practice: from commitment to deployment
GS3 · Investment models; effects of liberalisation on the economy
India's record foreign direct investment inflows have not been matched by the pace at which investment is deployed in greenfield projects. Discuss the internal governance bottlenecks behind this gap and suggest reforms.250 words · answer outline below
IntroRecord gross inflows, yet committed money becomes projects only when approvals, rules and contracts work
BottlenecksConcurrent List labour rules; DPIIT nodal but not the decision-maker; court pendency; QCOs on inputs; investor-protection gaps in TEPA
Reformsstaff commercial benches and mediation; align State rules; risk-based QCOs; enforce approval deadlines; balanced treaty protection
CloseMobile phones show what coordinated policy achieves; predictability turns commitment into deployment
Interview follow-up: which single bottleneck would you fix first to speed up investment, and why?
Greenfield investmentConcurrent ListQuality Control OrdersInvestor protectionRight to regulateContract enforcement

Sources: The Hindu, op-ed by Bharat Joshi, 9 October 2026; PIB background release on the four Labour Codes, 21 November 2025; PIB, Implementation of Labour Codes, 24 July 2025; PIB background release, India-EFTA TEPA comes into force, 1 October 2025

Source: Calibrating Inbound Investment: FDI, Labour Codes, QCOs — Ujiyari.com | Free UPSC & State PCS Editorial Analysis