The Lift Line

“We cannot make the Himalayas safe. But we can make it better observed. And in a changing climate, observation is the first line of defence.” (Anurag Maloo and Ronak Sutaria, The Indian Express)

Why This Editorial Matters for Your Exam

This column in The Indian Express, published on 8 October 2026, is by Anurag Maloo, founder and CEO of The Voice of Glaciers Foundation (TVGF) and Orophile Ventures, who survived 72 hours trapped in a glacial crevasse at 6,000 metres on Annapurna in April 2023, and Ronak Sutaria, founder and CEO of Respirer Living Sciences. It reads a string of deadly avalanches as a warning about a warming cryosphere, and asks a practical question: who watches the Himalayan slopes, and who gets told when they move?

For background, we covered the Rasuwa flood in our 29 August report, and the case for cryosphere early warning in our editorials on the Himalayan cryosphere and early warning after the Nepal flood and on a tripartite mechanism for Himalayan glaciers. This piece adds what those did not cover: snow avalanches, the technology that can detect them, India’s avalanche forecasting set-up, and the question of who receives a warning.

GS Paper 3: Disaster and disaster management; conservation, environmental degradation and climate change; science and technology in everyday life. GS Paper 1: Important geophysical phenomena; salient features of the world’s physical geography. GS Paper 4: Voluntary and involuntary risk, and the state’s duty of care.

In the news: after deadly avalanches on Manaslu and at Himlung base camp in September, the authors ask for an open, cross-border network to watch 100 high-risk locations in the Himalaya.

New to this topic? Start here: the basics in plain words (revision card 1 of 7)
Revision card 1 of 7 · Start here
New to this topic? The basics in plain words
Read this first; the other cards are at the end of the article
An avalanche is a rapid slide of snow, ice and debris down a mountainside. This column argues that a warming Himalaya is making slopes less stable, and that the answer is to watch them better and warn everyone in the path.
How warming turns into danger (step by step)
The cryosphere warms
→
Snowpack and frozen ground weaken
→
Snow, ice or rock gives way
→
People in the path
→
Warning comes in minutes, or not at all
The puzzle
If India already forecasts avalanches, why do the authors want a new network? Because most of the region is unwatched, and warnings stop at mandates and borders.
Jargon buster
Cryosphere the frozen parts of the Earth: snow, glaciers, permafrost
Permafrost frozen ground that acts as a geological adhesive in high-altitude terrain
HKH the Hindu Kush Himalaya
DGRE Defence Geoinformatics Research Establishment, Chandigarh, under DRDO

Background and Context

The events the column starts from

The authors list a run of deaths in the high Himalaya and the Karakoram. The figures below are theirs.

When Where What happened (per the authors)
30 July 2026 Broad Peak, Karakoram An avalanche killed Nirmal ‘Nims’ Purja, who had climbed all 14 eight-thousanders in 189 days, and nine other experienced climbers
26 August 2026 Rasuwa, Nepal Rock and glacier ice broke away above the Lende Khola and sent a flood through Rasuwa and Nuwakot; “More than 1,500 people are dead, and over 5,500 are still missing”
19 September 2026 Camp III, Manaslu An avalanche fell on a tent, killing a climber and his guide
27 September 2026 Himlung base camp About four metres of snow buried the camp; sixteen Nepali guides and kitchen staff were in the tents, and none are believed to have survived

Casualty counts for the Rasuwa flood changed as searches went on; the numbers in the table are the ones the authors give.

⚠️ Geography check: the Bhote Koshi of Rasuwa is the upper Trishuli. It flows into the Narayani (Gandaki) system, which enters India as the Gandak. It is not a tributary of the Koshi. Nepal has another Bhote Koshi, in Sindhupalchok, which does feed the Koshi. Our 29 August report explains the difference.

What an avalanche is

The National Disaster Management Authority’s guidelines on the Management of Landslides and Snow Avalanches (June 2009) define it plainly: “Snow Avalanche is a slide of snow mass down a mountainside. It is a rapid, down slope movement of large detached mass of snow, ice and associated debris such as rock fragments, soil and vegetation.”

Point What the NDMA guidelines say
Types “There are two basic types of avalanches, loose snow avalanches and slab avalanches.”
The dangerous one “Slab avalanches are often dangerous, unpredictable in behaviour, and account for most of the damage.”
Powder avalanches Dry-snow slides that throw up a dust cloud are “called powder snow avalanches” and “most frequently originate as soft slabs.”
Ingredients A steep slope, snow cover, a weak layer in the snow cover, and a trigger
Slope “Most avalanches of dangerous size therefore originate on slopes with inclinations of between 30 degrees and 45 degrees.” Convex slopes are more susceptible than concave ones.
Release “by an increase in stress (e.g., by fresh snow) and/or a decrease in strength (e.g., by warming or rain)”

That last line is the bridge to the column: warming weakens the snowpack and the frozen ground that holds rock in place, so the same slope becomes less stable.

Who forecasts avalanches in India

In a written reply in the Lok Sabha in March 2025, the Ministry of Home Affairs set out the arrangement:

  • The Defence Research and Development Organisation (DRDO) is “a national level agency for avalanche forecasting” and runs daily operational avalanche forecasting for defence users.
  • Its Defence Geoinformatics Research Establishment (DGRE), Chandigarh, is the nodal agency for studying and developing avalanche mitigation technologies.
  • DGRE had installed 72 Snow Meteorological Observatories; 45 automatic weather stations (AWS) were operational, 100 under testing and 203 under installation.
  • Forecasts are issued “at least 24 hour in advance”. The India Meteorological Department supplies six-hourly weather updates, and the NCMRWF sends forecasts to DGRE daily.
  • “Regular operational avalanche warning is issued by DGRE to the Army and civilian population in the snow bound regions of north-west Himalayas.”
  • In what the reply calls “a first in India”, an avalanche monitoring radar has been installed in North Sikkim; it “can detect avalanches within three seconds of trigger”.

The signal from the snow

ICIMOD (the International Centre for Integrated Mountain Development) reported in its Snow Update Report 2026 that snow cover across the Hindu Kush Himalaya (HKH) had “fallen to 27.8% below the long-term average, breaking last year’s record low and marking the fourth consecutive year below-normal snow persistence”. Ten of the 12 major river basins that rise in the HKH were below normal. The authors add that ICIMOD’s March assessment found glacier loss across the region accelerating since 2000.

How many avalanches are recorded

A 2023 review in the journal Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences built the HiAVAL database of avalanches in High Mountain Asia. It has 681 entries between 1972 and 2022; “In 116 events a total of 3131 people were killed”. By country, Afghanistan recorded the most avalanche deaths (1,057), followed by India (952) and Nepal (508). The review also found that 564 people lost their lives climbing peaks above 4,500 metres, one-third of them staff employed as guides or porters.

The column describes the 681 as avalanches “with recorded fatalities”; in the study itself, 681 is the number of avalanches recorded, and deaths were recorded in 116 of them.

The Analysis

1. The danger is growing inside the mountain. The authors quote Md Farooq Azam, Senior Cryosphere Intervention Manager at ICIMOD: “Higher elevations are warming faster, permafrost is thawing, and glaciers are thinning, which leaves ice and rock on steep faces less stable than they were a generation ago. Most of this happens inside the mountain, where no climber or villager can see it. Instruments can.” Permafrost, in the authors’ words, is “the frozen ground that acts as a geological adhesive in high-altitude terrain”; as it thaws, rock faces once treated as stable begin to shed.

2. What is not counted is not managed. “Most avalanches in the region are never recorded,” the authors write. They say that of the 63,700 glaciers in the HKH, only 38 have had any ground-based mass-balance monitoring, and just seven meet the standards of the World Glacier Monitoring Service. A region that cannot count its hazards cannot map its risk, and the HiAVAL figures above show how thin the record is.

3. The tools already exist. The column lists them: satellite radar (Sentinel-1 SAR) for wide, inaccessible areas; seismic sensor arrays that pick up ground vibrations; infrasound detectors for low-frequency sound; Doppler radars that track an avalanche’s movement and speed; ultrasonic snow-depth sensors; and automatic weather stations, combined with AI and deep learning in an “HKH Mountain Intelligence System”. Such a system would do three jobs: detect start zones, monitor pathways, and give early warning, which the authors note does not “necessarily forecast or predict” but can give people in the path the minutes they need.

4. Who gets the warning? Here the column’s sharpest claim needs a qualification. The authors say DGRE’s mandate “is primarily military, and its forecasts serve the armed forces and the Border Roads Organisation first”. The government’s own account to Parliament says DGRE’s regular warnings go to “the Army and civilian population in the snow bound regions of north-west Himalayas”. Read together, the gap is less about whether civilians are warned at all and more about reach: the eastern and central Himalaya, trekking routes, hydropower sites, and above all across borders. As ICIMOD noted, the Rasuwa collapse on the Nepali side lay outside the reach of China’s early warning system. “Rivers, glaciers, and avalanches pay no attention to the line on the map. Observation cannot either.”

5. The ask, and the ethics behind it. The authors propose “an avalanche-enabled weather station for every dangerous mountain corridor”, beginning with a Himalayan Cryosphere Observatory Network across 100 high-risk locations, “shared across borders and open to civilians”. Their moral case rests on who bears the risk: “Nims chose to climb, knowing the dangers. Soldiers at Siachen do not get that choice.” Nor, they add, did the kitchen staff at Himlung or the hydropower workers on the Bhote Koshi.

Data and Institutions Vault

Prelims-grade facts:

  • Snow avalanche (NDMA guidelines, 2009): a rapid, down-slope movement of a large detached mass of snow, ice and debris.
  • Two basic types: loose snow and slab avalanches; slab avalanches account for most of the damage.
  • Danger slopes: most dangerous avalanches start on slopes of 30 to 45 degrees; convex slopes are more prone than concave.
  • DRDO: a national-level agency for avalanche forecasting; its DGRE, Chandigarh, is the nodal agency for mitigation technology.
  • DGRE network: 72 snow meteorological observatories; 45 AWS operational, 100 under testing, 203 under installation.
  • North Sikkim: an avalanche monitoring radar, “a first in India” in the government’s words; detects an avalanche within three seconds of trigger.
  • ICIMOD Snow Update 2026: HKH snow cover 27.8% below the long-term average; ten of 12 major basins below normal.
  • HiAVAL (1972-2022): 681 avalanches recorded; 3,131 deaths in 116 events; Afghanistan 1,057, India 952, Nepal 508.

⚠️ Watch the trap: The Bhote Koshi of Rasuwa belongs to the Gandaki system (upper Trishuli, then Narayani, then Gandak in India), not the Koshi. 681 is the number of avalanches recorded in the HiAVAL database, not the number of fatal ones. And per the government’s account, DGRE’s avalanche warnings go to both the Army and civilians in the north-west Himalaya.

The Debate

For the network The cautions
The hazard is rising as the cryosphere warms, and most of it happens where people cannot see Not every avalanche can be blamed on a warming climate, as ICIMOD’s own expert concedes
The sensors and the AI already exist: satellite radar already detects avalanches over large areas, and India has a radar working in North Sikkim Instruments at high altitude are costly to install, power and maintain
Millions downstream, and workers who did not choose the risk, need warnings An early warning buys minutes, not safety; evacuation routes and drills must follow
Hazards cross borders, so data must too Border areas are militarily sensitive, which makes open sharing of sensor data hard
A network of 100 high-risk sites is a manageable start India already runs a defence forecasting network; the case is for wider reach, not a parallel system

How to Think About This

Break disaster risk into three parts: the hazard (the avalanche or collapse), the exposure (who is in its path), and the warning (whether those people are told in time). The column argues that warming raises the hazard, that the exposed now include porters, kitchen staff, workers and villages as well as soldiers and climbers, and that warnings stop at institutional mandates and national borders. A good answer names all three.

For GS4, use the authors’ contrast between voluntary and involuntary risk: a climber accepts danger by choice; a soldier at Siachen, a porter or a project worker does not. The state owes the second group a stronger duty of care, and an open warning system is one way to discharge it.

Diagram-in-Words

Argument map

Why the Himalaya needs to be watched

A warming cryosphere, hazards no one can see, and warnings that stop at mandates and borders.

A warming cryosphere HKH snow cover 27.8% below the long-term average; permafrost thawing, glaciers thinning Snow avalanches Manaslu and Himlung in September Rock and ice collapse above the Lende Khola, Rasuwa Flood downstream through Rasuwa and Nuwakot the hazards it loosens Porters and workers kitchen staff, guides, hydropower workers Most events unrecorded 681 avalanches in the HiAVAL record, 1972-2022 Warnings stop short at mandates and at borders who is exposed, and the gaps Observe what cannot be made safe a Himalayan Cryosphere Observatory Network: 100 high-risk locations, cross-border, open to civilians
The authors' chain of reasoning in The Indian Express: from a warming cryosphere to an open observatory network.

Takeaway Box

  • The argument: the Himalaya cannot be made safe, but it can be better observed; observation is “the first line of defence”.
  • The signal: HKH snow cover 27.8 per cent below the long-term average (ICIMOD, 2026); permafrost thawing and glaciers thinning.
  • The gap: most avalanches go unrecorded; the HiAVAL database lists 681 avalanches and 3,131 deaths from 1972 to 2022.
  • India’s system: DRDO forecasts avalanches; DGRE runs observatories and weather stations, and a radar in North Sikkim detects avalanches within three seconds.
  • The ask: a Himalayan Cryosphere Observatory Network at 100 high-risk locations, shared across borders and open to civilians.

Revision Cards

Swipe for cards 2 to 7 →Card 1, the basics, is near the top
Revision card 2 of 7 · The argument
Observe what cannot be made safe
Anurag Maloo and Ronak Sutaria, The Indian Express, 8 October 2026 · GS3 Disaster management, GS1 Geography
In one line: the Himalaya cannot be made safe, but it can be better observed; an open, cross-border network should watch 100 high-risk locations.
Why the authors want a network (per the column)
The ground is shifting higher elevations warming faster, permafrost thawing, glaciers thinning
→
Most events go unrecorded only 38 of 63,700 glaciers have had ground-based mass-balance monitoring
→
Warnings stop short at mandates and at borders
Numbers to quote
27.8% HKH snow cover below the long-term average (ICIMOD, 2026)
3,131 deaths in 116 recorded events, HiAVAL database, 1972-2022
UjiyariHow an avalanche starts: card 3 →
Revision card 3 of 7 · Why it moved
How an avalanche starts
The science, from the NDMA guidelines
NDMA guidelines on landslides and snow avalanches (June 2009)
Two basic types: loose snow avalanches and slab avalanches
Most damage: slab avalanches
Slope: most dangerous avalanches start on slopes of 30 to 45 degrees; convex slopes are more prone
Release: stress rises (fresh snow) or strength falls (warming or rain)
Four ingredients
A steep slope 30 to 45 degrees is the danger band
→
Snow cover with a weak layer inside it
→
A trigger fresh snow, warming or rain
In plain words: warming weakens the snowpack and the frozen ground that holds rock in place, so the same slope becomes less stable.
UjiyariWho forecasts in India: card 4 →
Revision card 4 of 7 · The static base
Who forecasts avalanches in India
Institutions and numbers · GS3 static portion
The arrangement told to the Lok Sabha (March 2025)
DRDO: a national-level agency for avalanche forecasting
DGRE, Chandigarh: nodal agency for avalanche mitigation technology
Network: 72 snow meteorological observatories; 45 AWS operational, 100 under testing, 203 under installation
North Sikkim: avalanche monitoring radar, 'a first in India' per the government; detects an avalanche within three seconds of trigger
Who is who
NameWhat it isICIMODInternational Centre for Integrated Mountain Development; its Snow Update Report 2026 found snow cover 27.8% below the long-term averageHiAVALa database of avalanches in High Mountain Asia: 681 entries between 1972 and 2022NDMANational Disaster Management Authority; guidelines on landslides and snow avalanches, June 2009
In plain words: the government says DGRE's warnings reach the Army and civilians in the north-west Himalaya; the authors want every dangerous mountain corridor watched, with data shared across borders and open to civilians.
UjiyariTest yourself on card 5 →
Revision card 5 of 7 · Test yourself
Prelims practice, UPSC pattern
Choose an option, then tap Show answer
Q1. With reference to snow avalanches, consider the following statements:
1.Slab avalanches account for most of the damage.
2.Most avalanches of dangerous size originate on slopes of between 30 and 45 degrees.
3.Concave slopes are more susceptible to avalanches than convex slopes.
How many of the statements given above are correct?
(a) Only one(b) Only two(c) All three(d) None
Show answer
Answer: (b) Statements 1 and 2 are correct, per the NDMA guidelines. Statement 3 is reversed: convex slopes are more susceptible than concave ones.
Q2. Consider the following statements:
Statement-I: The Bhote Koshi of Rasuwa district in Nepal is a tributary of the Koshi.
Statement-II: The Bhote Koshi of Sindhupalchok district in Nepal feeds the Koshi.
Which one of the following is correct?
(a) Both correct; II explains I(b) Both correct; II does not explain I(c) I correct, II incorrect(d) I incorrect, II correct
Show answer
Answer: (d) Statement-I is wrong: the Rasuwa Bhote Koshi is the upper Trishuli, in the Gandaki system, which enters India as the Gandak. Statement-II is correct: the Bhote Koshi of Sindhupalchok does feed the Koshi.
Q3. Consider the following pairs:
1.DGRE : Chandigarh
2.ICIMOD Snow Update Report 2026 : snow cover 27.8% below the long-term average
3.North Sikkim : avalanche monitoring radar ('a first in India', per the government)
How many of the pairs given above are correctly matched?
(a) Only one(b) Only two(c) All three(d) None
Show answer
Answer: (c) All three pairs are correct.
UjiyariOn card 6: traps, recall and memory hooks →
Revision card 6 of 7 · Remember
Prelims traps, quick recall and memory hooks
Cover the green side, then tap a question to check yourself
Prelims traps
The Rasuwa flood ran down a Koshi tributary
The Rasuwa Bhote Koshi is the upper Trishuli, in the Gandaki system
681 avalanches with recorded deaths
681 avalanches recorded; deaths in 116 of them
DGRE warns only the Army
Per the government, its warnings reach the Army and civilians in the north-west Himalaya
Quick recall
R1Which country recorded the most avalanche deaths in the HiAVAL database?
Afghanistan: 1,057, then India 952 and Nepal 508
R2How far ahead does DGRE issue avalanche forecasts?
At least 24 hours
R3How fast does the North Sikkim radar detect an avalanche?
Within three seconds of trigger
R4How many high-risk locations would the proposed network start with?
100
Memory hooks (for first-timers)
Slab does the damage the dangerous type, per the NDMA
Thirty to forty-five the danger band of slope angles
Watch, then warn observation is the first line of defence
UjiyariWrite the Mains answer on card 7 →
Revision card 7 of 7 · Write
Mains practice: watching the Himalaya
GS3 · Disaster management; GS1 · Geophysical phenomena
Examine how a warming climate is changing avalanche and glacier hazards in the Himalaya. Discuss the case for a cross-border cryosphere monitoring network, and the challenges in making its warnings reach civilians.250 words · answer outline below
IntroHKH snow cover 27.8% below the long-term average (ICIMOD, 2026)
HazardFaster warming at height, thawing permafrost, thinning glaciers; NDMA: warming lowers snow strength
Data gapMost avalanches unrecorded; HiAVAL lists 681 avalanches and 3,131 deaths, 1972-2022
IndiaDRDO forecasts; DGRE observatories and AWS; radar in North Sikkim
NetworkStart-zone detection, pathway monitoring, early warning; satellite, seismic, infrasound, Doppler, AI
ChallengesCost at altitude, sensitive borders, data sharing, warnings that miss porters and workers
Interview follow-up: a climber accepts the risk of an avalanche; a porter or a soldier does not. Should the state owe them different duties of care?
CryospherePermafrostSlab avalancheEarly warningCross-border dataObservation

Sources: The Indian Express, Anurag Maloo and Ronak Sutaria, “What does surviving an avalanche teach you?”; PIB, Ministry of Home Affairs, avalanche forecasting (Lok Sabha reply, March 2025); ICIMOD, Snow Update Report 2026 press release (April 2026); Acharya et al., Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 2023; NDMA Guidelines, Management of Landslides and Snow Avalanches (June 2009)

Source: Himalayan Avalanches and Climate Change: Early Warning Gap — Ujiyari.com | Free UPSC & State PCS Editorial Analysis