UPSC Prelims Practice
Current Affairs Quiz 27 October 2026
Test Your Knowledge
14 questions based on today’s current affairs & editorials
Choose number of questions
Question 1 of 14
1 The screening stage applies only to Category B projects.
2 The public hearing is conducted by the State Pollution Control Board (or a Union Territory Pollution Control Committee) at or near the project site.
3 The public hearing is presided over by the Chairperson of the State Pollution Control Board.
4 The Expert Appraisal Committee scrutinises the final EIA report together with the outcome of the public consultations, including the public hearing proceedings.
How many of the above statements are correct?
Facts
Statement 1Correct
The four stages run in sequential order (screening, scoping, public consultation, appraisal), and screening is for Category B projects only.
Statement 2Correct
The SPCB, or a Union Territory Pollution Control Committee, holds the hearing at or near the site, district-wise, and forwards the proceedings to the regulatory authority within 45 days of the applicant’s request.
Statement 3Incorrect
The District Magistrate or Deputy Commissioner, or a representative not below the rank of Additional District Magistrate or another district-level officer the DM authorises, presides (Appendix IV, para 4.0); the SPCB conducts the hearing but does not chair it.
Statement 4Correct
The Expert Appraisal Committee (or its State-level counterpart) scrutinises the final EIA report and the ‘outcome of the public consultations including public hearing proceedings’.
Analysis
A 12-hour shutdown in Arunachal Pradesh’s Upper Subansiri district against the proposed 1,605 MW Subansiri Upper Hydroelectric Project put this procedure in the news; The Hindu reported that a public hearing on the project was cancelled after violence during the shutdown.
Concept note
The EIA Notification, 2006 (S.O. 1533(E), issued on 14 September 2006) sets the route by which a project that needs prior environmental clearance is examined. Its four stages run ‘in sequential order’: screening (for Category B projects only), scoping, public consultation and appraisal.
All Category A and Category B1 projects must hold public consultation, with a few exceptions such as the modernisation of irrigation projects. Consultation is the process by which ‘the concerns of local affected persons and others who have plausible stake in the environmental impacts’ of a project are ascertained.
It has two parts: a public hearing at or near the site, district-wise, for local affected persons, and written responses from others with a plausible stake. A hearing may not be postponed ‘unless some untoward emergency situation occurs’, and then only on the District Magistrate’s recommendation (Appendix IV, para 3.3).
Where the agency reports that a hearing cannot be held in a way that lets local views be ‘freely expressed’, the regulatory authority may decide that consultation need not include it. For local people, the hearing is the legal channel for consent, and its record is what the expert committee later relies on.
🎯 Concept Kit tap to expand
| 🔗 Cross-Paper Links | ** GS3 environmental impact assessment and conservation; GS2 participatory governance and the rights of local communities. ** |
| ✍️ Mains Keywords | ** public consultation, prior environmental clearance, Expert Appraisal Committee, local consent. ** |
| ⚠️ Common Mistake | ** thinking the SPCB chairs the hearing; the SPCB conducts it, but the District Magistrate or a district-level representative presides. ** |
| 📌 Exam Tip | ** memorise the four stages in order (screening, scoping, public consultation, appraisal) and that screening applies to Category B projects only. ** |
| 🎤 Interview | ** when local people say they could not speak freely at a public hearing, should the clearance process pause, even for a project of strategic importance? |
Question 2 of 14
Instrument : Subject or feature
1. Cartagena Protocol : Safe handling, transport and use of living modified organisms
2. Nagoya Protocol : Fair and equitable sharing of benefits from the utilization of genetic resources
3. Cali Fund : Contributions from private sector entities making commercial use of digital sequence information on genetic resources
4. Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework : Four goals for 2050 and 23 targets for 2030
How many of the pairs given above are correctly matched?
Facts
Pair 1Correct
The Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety aims at the safe handling, transport and use of living modified organisms (LMOs) resulting from modern biotechnology; it was adopted on 29 January 2000 and entered into force on 11 September 2003.
Pair 2Correct
The Nagoya Protocol on access and benefit-sharing (ABS), adopted in Nagoya, Japan, on 29 October 2010, entered into force on 12 October 2014.
Pair 3Correct
The Cali Fund, set up by decision 16/2 at COP-16 in Cali, is meant to receive contributions from private sector entities making commercial use of DSI, and at least half of its funding should support the self-identified needs of indigenous peoples and local communities, where appropriate.
Pair 4Correct
The KMGBF, adopted by decision 15/4 at the second part of COP-15 in Montreal, sets 4 goals for 2050 and 23 targets for 2030.
Analysis
The usual trap is to swap Cartagena (biosafety) and Nagoya (benefit-sharing). Union Minister Bhupender Yadav delivered India’s National Statement at the High-Level Segment of COP-17 to the CBD in Yerevan, Armenia, saying the KMGBF must be implemented in line with national priorities.
Concept note
The Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) was signed by 150 government leaders at the 1992 Rio Earth Summit. It has three objectives: the conservation of biological diversity, the sustainable use of its components, and the fair and equitable sharing of the benefits arising out of the utilization of genetic resources.
COP-17 in Yerevan runs alongside the 12th meeting of the Parties to the Cartagena Protocol and the sixth meeting of the Parties to the Nagoya Protocol. The Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework (KMGBF) was adopted on 19 December 2022.
Its Target 3 asks that at least 30 per cent of terrestrial and inland water areas, and of marine and coastal areas, be effectively conserved by 2030 through protected areas and other effective area-based conservation measures (OECMs). Goal C seeks the fair sharing of benefits from genetic resources, DSI and associated traditional knowledge; Goal D seeks adequate means of implementation and names a biodiversity finance gap of $700 billion per year.
In India, the Biological Diversity Act, 2002 (amended in 2023) works through three tiers: the National Biodiversity Authority (a statutory body set up in 2003, based in Chennai), State Biodiversity Boards and local Biodiversity Management Committees.
🎯 Concept Kit tap to expand
| 🔗 Cross-Paper Links | ** GS3 conservation and international environmental agreements; GS2 India’s positions in multilateral forums. ** |
| ✍️ Mains Keywords | ** 30x30, access and benefit-sharing, digital sequence information, means of implementation. ** |
| ⚠️ Common Mistake | ** swapping the protocols; Cartagena is biosafety (LMOs), Nagoya is access and benefit-sharing. ** |
| 📌 Exam Tip | ** tie each instrument to its COP: the KMGBF to COP-15 (decision 15/4, Montreal) and the Cali Fund to COP-16 (decision 16/2, Cali). ** |
| 🎤 Interview | ** is a fund fed by companies that use digital sequence information a fair way to share the gains from genetic resources with the communities that conserve them? |
Question 3 of 14
Statement-I: Under the Constitution of India, the Chief Election Commissioner shall not be removed from office except in like manner and on the like grounds as a Judge of the Supreme Court.
Statement-II: Under the Constitution of India, an Election Commissioner other than the Chief Election Commissioner shall not be removed from office except on the recommendation of the Chief Election Commissioner.
Which one of the following is correct in respect of the above statements?
Facts
Statement ICorrect
The first proviso to Article 324(5) says the CEC ‘shall not be removed from his office except in like manner and on the like grounds as a Judge of the Supreme Court’.
Statement IICorrectDoes not explain Statement I
A further proviso to Article 324(5) says any other Election Commissioner or a Regional Commissioner ‘shall not be removed from office except on the recommendation of the Chief Election Commissioner’. That is a separate safeguard for the other Commissioners; it is not the reason the CEC enjoys a judge’s protection.
Analysis
In a joint counter-affidavit in the Supreme Court, the ECI, the CEC and the two Election Commissioners relied on Article 324(5) to argue that a plea to restrain the CEC from functioning is not maintainable. Both sides’ positions are contentions in a pending case; the Court has made no finding.
Concept note
Article 324(5) carries two safeguards of different strength. The first proviso gives the Chief Election Commissioner the protection of a Supreme Court judge: he ‘shall not be removed from his office except in like manner and on the like grounds as a Judge of the Supreme Court’.
A further proviso protects the other Election Commissioners and the Regional Commissioners in another way: they ‘shall not be removed from office except on the recommendation of the Chief Election Commissioner’. The CEC’s tenure is thus secured directly by the Constitution, while the removal of the other Commissioners turns in part on the CEC’s recommendation.
The appointment, conditions of service and term of office of the Commissioners are the subject of the Chief Election Commissioner and Other Election Commissioners (Appointment, Conditions of Service and Term of Office) Act, 2023. In the case now before the Supreme Court, the petitioners allege that decisions on the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls were taken without the concurrence of the other two Commissioners; the ECI says all such decisions were unanimous and that Form 6, used to include names in electoral rolls, was not amended.
🎯 Concept Kit tap to expand
| 🔗 Cross-Paper Links | ** GS2 constitutional bodies (Election Commission) and electoral reform; GS4 independence and probity of institutions. ** |
| ✍️ Mains Keywords | ** security of tenure, institutional independence, collegial decision-making, free and fair elections. ** |
| ⚠️ Common Mistake | ** assuming every Election Commissioner enjoys a judge’s protection; only the CEC does, and the others are removable on the CEC’s recommendation. ** |
| 📌 Exam Tip | ** read Article 324(5) with both provisos; a Statement-I/II pair can be two true statements that do not explain each other. ** |
| 🎤 Interview | ** should the other Election Commissioners get the same security of tenure as the CEC? |
Question 4 of 14
1 The Digital Personal Data Protection Act, 2023 establishes the Data Protection Board of India.
2 The Digital Personal Data Protection Act, 2023 substitutes clause (j) of Section 8(1) of the Right to Information Act, 2005.
3 In Justice K S Puttaswamy (Retd.) v. Union of India, the Supreme Court held that the right to privacy is protected as an intrinsic part of the right to life and personal liberty under Article 21.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
Facts
Statement 1Correct
Section 18 of the DPDP Act, 2023 (Act No. 22 of 2023) establishes the Data Protection Board of India.
Statement 2Correct
Section 44(3) of the Act substitutes clause (j) of Section 8(1) of the RTI Act, 2005 with ‘information which relates to personal information’.
Statement 3Correct
In Puttaswamy (24 August 2017), the Supreme Court held that the right to privacy is protected as an intrinsic part of the right to life and personal liberty under Article 21.
Analysis
The Supreme Court has issued notice on a writ petition under Article 32 by the Digital News Publishers Association (DNPA) challenging provisions of the Act, among them Section 44(3). The Court has stayed no provision and made no finding; the grounds are the petitioners’ contentions.
Concept note
The right to privacy became the constitutional base for India’s data law through Justice K S Puttaswamy (Retd.) v. Union of India (24 August 2017), in which the Supreme Court held privacy to be protected as an intrinsic part of the right to life and personal liberty under Article 21. The Digital Personal Data Protection Act, 2023 (Act No. 22 of 2023, dated 11 August 2023) is the statute that followed.
Section 18 establishes the Data Protection Board of India. Section 44(3) reaches into another law: it substitutes clause (j) of Section 8(1) of the RTI Act, 2005 with ‘information which relates to personal information’.
The DNPA’s petition argues, among other grounds, that the Act has no exemption for journalism, that the Centre’s power to call for information under Section 36 lacks judicial oversight, and that the new Section 8(1)(j) is a blanket restriction on disclosure. The Court has issued notice only.
For a Mains answer, the case sets two rights against each other: a person’s control over personal data, and a citizen’s right to information. The Chief Justice of India said a balance has to be struck between the rights of citizens and those of the media.
🎯 Concept Kit tap to expand
| 🔗 Cross-Paper Links | ** GS2 fundamental rights (Article 21), transparency and the RTI Act; GS3 data governance and cyber security. ** |
| ✍️ Mains Keywords | ** informational privacy, data fiduciary, right to information, proportionality. ** |
| ⚠️ Common Mistake | ** thinking the DPDP Act left the RTI Act untouched; Section 44(3) substitutes its Section 8(1)(j). ** |
| 📌 Exam Tip | ** link the three: Puttaswamy (Article 21), the DPDP Act, 2023 (Board under Section 18) and the RTI amendment (Section 44(3)). ** |
| 🎤 Interview | ** does protecting personal data shrink the space for journalism and the right to information? |
Question 5 of 14
1 It repealed the Indian Medical Council Act, 1956.
2 The Under-Graduate Medical Education Board constituted under the Act assesses and rates medical institutions.
3 The Medical Assessment and Rating Board can impose a monetary penalty, reduce intake or stop admissions.
4 The Ethics and Medical Registration Board maintains the National Register.
How many of the above statements are correct?
Facts
Statement 1Correct
The NMC Act, 2019 (Act No. 30 of 2019) repealed the Indian Medical Council Act, 1956 and dissolved the Medical Council of India.
Statement 2Incorrect
The UGMEB and PGMEB set standards and curricula; it is the Medical Assessment and Rating Board (MARB) that assesses and rates institutions.
Statement 3Correct
Under Section 26, MARB’s functions include ‘issuing warning, imposition of monetary penalty, reducing intake or stoppage of admissions and recommending to the Commission for withdrawal of recognition’.
Statement 4Correct
The Ethics and Medical Registration Board (EMRB) keeps the National Register and oversees professional ethics.
Analysis
The Hindu’s editorial criticises the NMC for withdrawing the Maintenance of Standards of Medical Education Regulations, 2023 (MSMER). The fine on institutions survives under the MARB Regulations, 2023, up to ₹1 crore per non-compliance; what went is the MSMER’s personal fine of up to ₹5 lakh on faculty, heads and doctors for false declarations or records.
Concept note
The National Medical Commission Act, 2019 replaced the Medical Council of India with a Commission and four autonomous boards under its overall supervision (Section 16). The Under-Graduate and Post-Graduate Medical Education Boards set standards and curricula and specify norms for compulsory annual disclosures by medical institutions.
The Medical Assessment and Rating Board assesses and rates institutions, grants permissions and, under Section 26, can warn, fine, reduce intake, stop admissions and recommend withdrawal of recognition; it must also publish the assessment and ratings of medical institutions at regular intervals. The Ethics and Medical Registration Board keeps the National Register and oversees professional ethics.
The Act also provides two national tests: NEET for admission and the National Exit Test, NExT. Regulations are made by the Commission under Section 57.
A person aggrieved by a board’s decision may appeal to the Commission within sixty days (Section 22(3)); under the MARB Regulations, 2023, an appeal against a MARB order lies within fifteen days, with a further appeal to the Central Government within thirty days. The Annual Disclosure Report continues under Sections 24(i) and 25(h) of the Act even after the MSMER’s withdrawal.
🎯 Concept Kit tap to expand
| 🔗 Cross-Paper Links | ** GS2 health, education and statutory regulatory bodies; GS4 transparency and accountability in public institutions. ** |
| ✍️ Mains Keywords | ** assessment and rating, self-disclosure, regulatory overlap, institutional accountability. ** |
| ⚠️ Common Mistake | ** crediting the education boards with rating colleges; MARB assesses and rates, while UGMEB and PGMEB set standards and curricula. ** |
| 📌 Exam Tip | ** learn the four boards under Section 16 with one job each: UGMEB and PGMEB (standards), MARB (assessment and rating), EMRB (register and ethics). ** |
| 🎤 Interview | ** does withdrawing a disclosure regulation simplify oversight or weaken it? |
Question 6 of 14
1 CII is a computer resource the incapacitation or destruction of which shall have debilitating impact on national security, economy, public health or safety.
2 The National Critical Information Infrastructure Protection Centre (NCIIPC) is the national nodal agency set up under Section 70B of the Act.
3 CERT-In may give directions to service providers, intermediaries, data centres and body corporates.
4 Directions issued by CERT-In require cyber incidents to be reported within 24 hours of noticing them.
How many of the above statements are correct?
Facts
Statement 1Correct
Under Section 70, CII is a computer resource ‘the incapacitation or destruction of which, shall have debilitating impact on national security, economy, public health or safety’.
Statement 2Incorrect
NCIIPC was set up under Section 70A; Section 70B is the provision for CERT-In, the national agency for responding to cyber security incidents.
Statement 3Correct
Section 70B(6) lets CERT-In call for information from and give directions to service providers, intermediaries, data centres and body corporates.
Statement 4Incorrect
CERT-In’s Directions of 28 April 2022 require cyber incidents to be reported within 6 hours of noticing them.
Analysis
Khyati Singh argues in The Hindu that the Kudankulam data leak shows India’s cyber rules bind the operator, not the contractors who hold its data. NPCIL says the material relates only to conventional Balance of Plant common service facilities and not to any nuclear safety or security system.
Concept note
The IT Act, 2000 builds a layered shield for critical information infrastructure. Under Section 70, the appropriate Government may, by notification in the Official Gazette, declare a computer resource that affects CII to be a protected system; unauthorised access to it is punishable with up to ten years’ imprisonment and a fine, and its security practices are set by the IT (Information Security Practices and Procedures for Protected Systems) Rules, 2018.
Section 70A provides for a national nodal agency for CII protection, and the National Critical Information Infrastructure Protection Centre was set up under it. Section 70B makes CERT-In the national agency for responding to cyber security incidents; not complying with its directions can bring up to one year in prison, or a fine up to ₹1 lakh, or both (Section 70B(7)).
CERT-In’s Directions of 28 April 2022 took effect 60 days after issue. Kudankulam has been here before: NPCIL said CERT-In told it on 4 September 2019 of malware on a PC in its administrative network; researchers identified it as Dtrack, reportedly developed by the Lazarus group.
The Digital Personal Data Protection Act, 2023 is a personal-data law; it is not a law on critical infrastructure.
🎯 Concept Kit tap to expand
| 🔗 Cross-Paper Links | ** GS3 cyber security and the security of critical infrastructure; GS3 nuclear energy. ** |
| ✍️ Mains Keywords | ** critical information infrastructure, protected system, supply-chain risk, incident reporting. ** |
| ⚠️ Common Mistake | ** swapping the two agencies; NCIIPC is Section 70A and CERT-In is Section 70B. ** |
| 📌 Exam Tip | ** remember the CERT-In reporting window as 6 hours, and that a protected system is declared by notification in the Official Gazette. ** |
| 🎤 Interview | ** when a contractor holds a nuclear plant’s documents, who should answer for their security? |
Question 7 of 14
Statement-I: An advisory issued by the National Human Rights Commission (NHRC) to Union Ministries and State Governments carries recommendations and is not a court order.
Statement-II: Among the NHRC’s functions under the Protection of Human Rights Act, 1993 is to review the safeguards for the protection of human rights and recommend measures for their effective implementation, and an advisory is a set of such recommendations.
Which one of the following is correct in respect of the above statements?
Facts
Statement ICorrect
An NHRC advisory carries recommendations; it is not a court order, and the Commission asks the authorities to implement its recommendations and furnish an Action Taken Report.
Statement IICorrectExplains Statement I
Section 12 of the Act lists the Commission’s functions, among them to ‘review the safeguards provided by or under the Constitution or any law for the time being in force for the protection of human rights and recommend measures for their effective implementation’. The Act casts this function as recommending measures, and an advisory is a set of such recommendations, which is why it is not a court order.
Analysis
The NHRC has issued an Advisory on ‘Women’s Safety at Work and Public Spaces’ to the Secretaries of Union Ministries, the Chairperson of the Railway Board and the Chief Secretaries and Administrators of all States and Union Territories, and has sought an Action Taken Report within two months.
Concept note
The National Human Rights Commission works under the Protection of Human Rights Act, 1993, which carries the number Act No. 10 of 1994. Section 12 of the Act lists the Commission’s functions.
One of them is to ‘review the safeguards provided by or under the Constitution or any law for the time being in force for the protection of human rights and recommend measures for their effective implementation’. That function is advisory in character: the Commission reviews and recommends, and an advisory carries recommendations; it is not a court order.
The latest advisory, on ‘Women’s Safety at Work and Public Spaces’, went to the Secretaries of Union Ministries, among them Women and Child Development, Education, Home Affairs, Labour and Employment, and Health and Family Welfare, to the Chairperson of the Railway Board, and to the Chief Secretaries and Administrators of all States and Union Territories. It covers eight areas: awareness on women’s safety and sexual harassment, infrastructure, bystander intervention, the role of the police, survivor support, cybercrime against women, long-term reforms and other measures.
The Commission has asked the authorities to implement its recommendations and furnish an Action Taken Report within two months.
🎯 Concept Kit tap to expand
| 🔗 Cross-Paper Links | ** GS2 statutory bodies and the protection of vulnerable sections; GS1 issues relating to women; GS4 ethics in public spaces and workplaces. ** |
| ✍️ Mains Keywords | ** recommendatory body, Action Taken Report, bystander intervention, safe workplaces. ** |
| ⚠️ Common Mistake | ** treating an NHRC advisory as a court order; it carries recommendations, and the Commission asks for an Action Taken Report on them. ** |
| 📌 Exam Tip | ** note the Act’s double identity: the Protection of Human Rights Act, 1993 is numbered Act No. 10 of 1994, and its Section 12 lists the functions. ** |
| 🎤 Interview | ** should NHRC recommendations be made binding, or does their persuasive character serve the Commission better? |
Question 8 of 14
1 The National Family Health Survey (NFHS) measures haemoglobin in venous blood samples.
2 NFHS-5 (2019-21) found a smaller share of children aged 6-59 months to be anaemic than NFHS-4 did.
3 The seventh beneficiary group added under the revised Anemia Mukt Bharat strategy is adolescents aged 10-19 years.
How many of the above statements are correct?
Facts
Statement 1Incorrect
NFHS tests capillary blood, and its own fact sheet warns that its results ‘need not be compared with other surveys using venous blood’.
Statement 2Incorrect
Anaemia among children aged 6-59 months rose from 58.6 per cent in NFHS-4 to 67.1 per cent in NFHS-5, about two-thirds of such children.
Statement 3Incorrect
Adolescent girls and boys (10-19 years) were already among the six groups of the 2018 6x6x6 strategy; the group added under 7x7x7 is low birth weight (LBW) babies aged 0-6 months.
Analysis
Five public health and nutrition specialists argue in The Hindu that double fortified salt should be scaled up, especially through the Public Distribution System, as the preventive arm of the revised strategy. NFHS-6 (2023-24) carries no anaemia figure; the Health Ministry has decided to adopt figures from an ICMR survey that uses venous blood, so the two cannot simply be read as a trend.
Concept note
The fifth National Family Health Survey (NFHS-5, 2019-21) is the most recent NFHS round with anaemia figures. It counts a child aged 6-59 months or a pregnant woman as anaemic below 11.0 g/dl of haemoglobin, a non-pregnant woman below 12.0 g/dl and a man below 13.0 g/dl.
Every group was more anaemic than in NFHS-4: children 67.1 per cent (58.6), all women aged 15-49 57.0 per cent (53.1), pregnant women 52.2 per cent (50.4) and men 25.0 per cent (22.7). Rural rates ran above urban ones: among children, 68.3 per cent against 64.2 per cent.
The policy response is Anemia Mukt Bharat, the Union Health Ministry’s programme launched in 2018 with a 6x6x6 strategy: six interventions for six beneficiary groups, through six institutional mechanisms. The Anemia Mukt Bharat Abhiyaan Operational Guidelines, released at the 16th meeting of the Central Council of Health and Family Welfare, move to 7x7x7: they add LBW babies (0-6 months), the ‘Eating Right’ approach and a monitoring and evaluation framework for digital tracking, and turn T3 (Test, Treat, Talk) into T4 (Test, Treat, Talk, Track).
Haemoglobin records are to be mapped through the JANANI, RBSK and U-WIN portals into a unified Anemia Mukt Bharat Abhiyaan Portal.
🎯 Concept Kit tap to expand
| 🔗 Cross-Paper Links | ** GS2 health and issues relating to poverty and hunger; GS3 food processing and the Public Distribution System. ** |
| ✍️ Mains Keywords | ** hidden hunger, Test-Treat-Talk-Track, capillary versus venous measurement, therapeutic care. ** |
| ⚠️ Common Mistake | ** reading an ICMR venous-blood figure as a trend against NFHS-5; the methods differ, and the survey itself warns against such comparison. ** |
| 📌 Exam Tip | ** NFHS-5 anaemia: children 6-59 months 67.1 per cent, all women 57.0 per cent, men 25.0 per cent; the seventh 7x7x7 group is LBW babies. ** |
| 🎤 Interview | ** should India fight anaemia mainly through fortified staples or through testing and treatment? |
Question 9 of 14
1 Their maritime boundary was settled by the award of an international arbitral tribunal.
2 India’s Operation Cactus was launched at the request of the Maldives to foil an attempted coup.
3 Bangladesh is a member of the Colombo Security Conclave.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
Facts
Statement 1Incorrect
The boundary was set by an agreement the two countries signed on 28 December 1976, joining 20 terminal or turning points by arcs of great circles over 496.25 nautical miles in the Arabian Sea, from a trijunction point that India, the Maldives and Sri Lanka had agreed on 31 July 1976.
Statement 2Correct
On 3 November 1988, foreign mercenaries backed by local conspirators attempted a coup; at the Maldives’ request, India launched Operation Cactus, and the Indian Air Force flew paratroopers from Agra to Male.
Statement 3Correct
Bangladesh is a member of the Colombo Security Conclave, with India, the Maldives, Mauritius, Sri Lanka and Seychelles. Seychelles attended the November 2025 meeting of the National Security Advisers as an observer, the members welcomed its decision to accede as a full member, and Prime Minister Modi welcomed it as a full member on 9 February 2026.
Analysis
An Associate Fellow at the Observer Research Foundation argues in The Indian Express that India should make its red lines clear after President Mohamed Muizzu’s state visit to Pakistan, where the two sides signed 20 MoUs, defence and maritime security among them.
Concept note
The Maldives lies south of India’s Lakshadweep islands, across a maritime boundary in the Arabian Sea fixed by the agreement of 28 December 1976; Minicoy is the Indian territory closest to the boundary’s western segment. Two episodes anchor the relationship in an answer.
In 1988, Operation Cactus showed India answering a neighbour’s call for help: within hours, the Indian Air Force flew paratroopers from Agra over 2,000 km to Male, where they landed at Hulhule airport. Today the anchor is economic support.
The Reserve Bank of India’s swap agreement with the Maldives Monetary Authority sits within the Framework on Currency Swap Arrangement for SAARC Countries, 2024-2027, a framework first introduced in 2012; RBI swap support to the Maldives since then exceeds USD 1.1 billion, PTI reported. A USD 400 million swap drawn in October 2024 has been settled, and the Rs 4,850 crore line of credit announced in July 2025 is the first line of credit to the Maldives denominated in Indian rupees.
Security cooperation runs through the Colombo Security Conclave. Muizzu’s visit to Pakistan, the first by a Maldivian president in 11 years, raises the question of whether such support should come with conditions.
🎯 Concept Kit tap to expand
| 🔗 Cross-Paper Links | ** GS2 India and its neighbourhood, and regional groupings; GS1 location of the Indian Ocean islands; GS3 maritime security. ** |
| ✍️ Mains Keywords | ** neighbourhood policy, maritime security, currency swap, leverage and red lines. ** |
| ⚠️ Common Mistake | ** using an old member list of the Colombo Security Conclave. Its six members are India, the Maldives, Sri Lanka, Mauritius, Bangladesh and Seychelles; Seychelles, an observer in November 2025, was welcomed as a full member in February 2026. ** |
| 📌 Exam Tip | ** the India-Maldives boundary lies in the Arabian Sea, by the agreement of 28 December 1976: 20 points, 496.25 nautical miles. ** |
| 🎤 Interview | ** should India attach conditions to its economic support for a neighbour that deepens ties with Pakistan? |
Question 10 of 14
1 Installed generation capacity is expressed in MW or GW, whereas the energy held in storage is expressed in MWh or GWh.
2 In the Central Electricity Authority’s installed capacity tables, the 'renewable energy sources' (RES) column includes large hydro.
3 In the Ministry of New and Renewable Energy’s figures, pumped storage capacity is counted separately from large hydro.
4 Grid Controller of India Limited (Grid-India) was formerly known as POSOCO.
How many of the above statements are correct?
Facts
Statement 1Correct
Capacity is counted in MW or GW, and stored energy in MWh or GWh.
Statement 2Incorrect
In CEA tables, ‘renewable energy sources’ exclude large hydro; renewable capacity including large hydro is a separate total.
Statement 3Incorrect
MNRE notes that its large hydro figure includes 7,425.6 MW of pumped storage, so pumped storage sits inside large hydro.
Statement 4Correct
Grid-India, the Grid Controller of India Limited, was formerly POSOCO and is charged with grid security.
Analysis
Somit Dasgupta argues in The Indian Express that India’s capacity boom has left the grid with surplus solar power by day and deficits at night, and that storage may stall because its price in competitive bids ‘is said to be non-remunerative’. On the CEA’s table as on 30 September 2026, solar stood at 171,051.47 MW of a total installed capacity of 558,896.39 MW.
Concept note
India’s power problem has moved from how much capacity to which hour. The Central Electricity Authority’s table as on 30 September 2026 gives a total installed capacity of 558,896.39 MW: thermal 250,869.87 MW, large hydro 52,064.66 MW, renewable energy sources (excluding large hydro) 247,181.87 MW, of which solar 171,051.47 MW, and nuclear 8,780.00 MW.
Solar helps only by day. On 21 May 2026, peak demand met reached 270.8 GW at 3:45 pm; an EAC-PM working paper drawing on Grid-India’s SCADA data traces how an evening rise pushed demand back up to a second peak of about 252 GW near 10:45 pm.
As the paper puts it, ‘In the dark, solar contributes nothing, and the net load (demand minus solar) is simply equal to total load.’ Storage shifts daytime energy to the night. The CEA’s National Electricity Plan 2023 projects an energy storage requirement of 82.37 GWh in 2026-27 (47.65 GWh pumped storage, 34.72 GWh battery), rising to 411.4 GWh in 2031-32 (175.18 GWh pumped storage, 236.22 GWh battery).
🎯 Concept Kit tap to expand
| 🔗 Cross-Paper Links | ** GS3 infrastructure (energy) and the energy transition; GS2 regulatory institutions in the power sector. ** |
| ✍️ Mains Keywords | ** net load, energy storage, grid flexibility, curtailment of solar power. ** |
| ⚠️ Common Mistake | ** adding large hydro into CEA’s 'renewable energy sources'; it is excluded there, and pumped storage sits inside MNRE’s large hydro figure. ** |
| 📌 Exam Tip | ** keep the units apart: MW for capacity, MWh for stored energy; the NEP 2023 storage need is stated in GWh. ** |
| 🎤 Interview | ** should India pay more for storage now, or keep backing down solar power by day? |
Question 11 of 14
Staple : Nutrients added under the FSSAI’s Fortification of Foods Regulations
1. Rice : Vitamins A and D
2. Double fortified salt : Iodine and iron
3. Edible oil : Iron, folic acid and vitamin B12
How many of the pairs given above are correctly matched?
Facts
Pair 1Incorrect
Rice, like wheat flour, is fortified with iron, folic acid and vitamin B12; vitamins A and D go into edible oil and milk.
Pair 2Correct
Double fortified salt (DFS) carries iodine and iron.
Pair 3Incorrect
Edible oil carries vitamins A and D, not iron, folic acid and vitamin B12.
Analysis
Five public health and nutrition specialists argue in The Hindu that DFS should be scaled up across all States, especially through the Public Distribution System. NFHS-5 found 94.3 per cent of households using iodised salt, up from 93.1 per cent in NFHS-4.
Concept note
Food fortification means adding nutrients to staple foods people already eat. The Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI) notified the Food Safety and Standards (Fortification of Foods) Regulations in 2018 for five staples.
Wheat flour and rice are fortified with iron, folic acid and vitamin B12; edible oil and milk with vitamins A and D; and double fortified salt with iodine and iron. Fortified products carry the +F logo.
Salt already has a wide reach: NFHS-5 found 94.3 per cent of households using iodised salt. Fortification is one strand of the response to anaemia.
The other is Anemia Mukt Bharat, the Union Health Ministry’s programme launched in 2018 with a 6x6x6 strategy and now revised into a 7x7x7 strategy that adds the ‘Eating Right’ approach and low birth weight babies as a beneficiary group. The revised guidelines extend the programme ‘beyond supplementation to encompass testing, therapeutic management, eating right and community involvement’ and aim to shift anaemia management ‘from prophylactic care to therapeutic care’.
For a Mains answer, fortification is a preventive, population-wide measure, while testing and treatment reach those already anaemic.
🎯 Concept Kit tap to expand
| 🔗 Cross-Paper Links | ** GS3 food processing and the Public Distribution System; GS2 health and nutrition programmes. ** |
| ✍️ Mains Keywords | ** micronutrient deficiency, double fortified salt, +F logo, targeted public distribution. ** |
| ⚠️ Common Mistake | ** putting iron, folic acid and vitamin B12 into salt; DFS carries iodine and iron, while those three go into wheat flour and rice. ** |
| 📌 Exam Tip | ** learn the five staples in three groups: wheat flour and rice; edible oil and milk; double fortified salt. ** |
| 🎤 Interview | ** should a fortified staple be made compulsory in the PDS, or should households keep the choice? |
Question 12 of 14
Statement-I: Under the Supreme Court’s judgment in Lalita Kumari v. Government of Uttar Pradesh, a preliminary inquiry before registering an FIR may be held in cases of commercial offences.
Statement-II: The scope of such a preliminary inquiry is to verify the veracity of the information received.
Which one of the following is correct in respect of the above statements?
Facts
Statement ICorrect
The Constitution Bench in Lalita Kumari (12 November 2013, para 111) lists ‘Commercial offences’ among the categories in which a preliminary inquiry may be held.
Statement IIIncorrect
The inquiry may be held ‘only to ascertain whether cognizable offence is disclosed or not’; its scope ‘is not to verify the veracity or otherwise of the information received’, and it should be time-bound and ‘should not exceed 7 days’.
Analysis
Abhinav Chandrachud writes in The Indian Express that slow civil courts push litigants owed money to the police, where the fear of arrest pushes debtors to settle. The law limits such an inquiry by purpose and time, not by subject.
Concept note
Lalita Kumari v. Government of Uttar Pradesh (Constitution Bench, 12 November 2013) held that registering an FIR is mandatory if the information discloses a cognizable offence. It was decided under Section 154 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.
Its successor, Section 173 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) lets the officer in charge, with the prior permission of an officer not below the rank of Deputy Superintendent of Police, hold a preliminary enquiry for an offence ‘punishable for three years or more but less than seven years’, within fourteen days (Section 173(3)). If the police refuse an FIR, the complainant may write to the Superintendent of Police and, if the SP does not act, apply to the Magistrate (Section 173(4)).
In Ashok Kumar Jain v. The State of Gujarat (2025 INSC 614), the Supreme Court quoted the rule that ‘Mere breach of contract cannot give rise to criminal prosecution for cheating unless fraudulent or dishonest intention is shown right at the beginning of the transaction’, and held that continuing an FIR that gave a civil dispute the colour of cheating was an abuse of the process of law.
🎯 Concept Kit tap to expand
| 🔗 Cross-Paper Links | ** GS2 judiciary and criminal justice reform; GS4 police ethics and the abuse of power. ** |
| ✍️ Mains Keywords | ** abuse of process, law in action, preliminary enquiry, judge-population ratio. ** |
| ⚠️ Common Mistake | ** thinking a preliminary inquiry tests whether the complaint is true; it only checks whether a cognizable offence is disclosed. ** |
| 📌 Exam Tip | ** pair the old and new rules: Lalita Kumari (not beyond 7 days) and BNSS Section 173(3) (fourteen days, with a DSP’s prior permission, for offences punishable for three years or more but less than seven years). ** |
| 🎤 Interview | ** as a Superintendent of Police, how would you stop officers from acting as debt collectors? |
Question 13 of 14
1 The river known as the Yarlung Tsangpo in Tibet enters Arunachal Pradesh as the Siang, also called the Dihang.
2 The Siang meets the Dibang and the Lohit to form the Brahmaputra.
3 The Subansiri joins the Brahmaputra on its left bank.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
Facts
Statement 1Correct
In Tibet the Brahmaputra is the Yarlung Tsangpo, and it enters Arunachal Pradesh as the Siang (Dihang), which runs about 293.9 km in India.
Statement 2Correct
The Siang meets the Dibang and the Lohit to form the Brahmaputra.
Statement 3Incorrect
About 195 km below that meeting point, the Subansiri joins the Brahmaputra on its right bank (a 2013 study for the Central Water Commission).
Analysis
A shutdown in Upper Subansiri district against the proposed Subansiri Upper Hydroelectric Project, and protests in the Siang valley against the proposed Siang Upper Multipurpose Project, have put both rivers in the news. Which bank a tributary joins is a common map trap.
Concept note
The Brahmaputra rises in the Kailash ranges of the Himalayas at about 5,150 m and flows about 2,900 km through Tibet (China), India and Bangladesh before joining the Ganga, according to the Central Water Commission. In Tibet it is the Yarlung Tsangpo.
It enters Arunachal Pradesh as the Siang, also called the Dihang, and meets the Dibang and the Lohit to form the Brahmaputra. The CWC lists its principal tributaries in India as the Dibang, the Lohit, the Subansiri, the Manas, the Tista, the Dhansiri and the Champamati.
A 2013 study for the CWC describes the Siang basin in India as bounded by the eastern Himalaya on the north, the Subansiri basin on the west and the Dibang basin on the east. The same study put the Siang sub-basin’s hydropower potential at over 18,000 MW, to be harnessed through 44 projects.
Both valleys now carry large dam proposals, and the EIA public hearing is the legal channel for consulting local people. For a Mains answer on the North-East, the river links physical geography, energy and the consent of the people who live along it.
🎯 Concept Kit tap to expand
| 🔗 Cross-Paper Links | ** GS1 drainage systems and the distribution of water resources; GS3 hydropower and infrastructure; GS2 trans-border rivers. ** |
| ✍️ Mains Keywords | ** trans-border river, hydropower potential, river basin planning, consultation with local communities. ** |
| ⚠️ Common Mistake | ** placing the Subansiri on the left bank; it joins the Brahmaputra on the right bank, below the meeting of the Siang, Dibang and Lohit. ** |
| 📌 Exam Tip | ** learn the CWC list of the Brahmaputra’s principal tributaries in India: Dibang, Lohit, Subansiri, Manas, Tista, Dhansiri and Champamati. ** |
| 🎤 Interview | ** should strategic concerns about a trans-border river outweigh local opposition to large dams in Arunachal Pradesh? |
Question 14 of 14
Facts
Kudankulam is in Radhapuram taluk of Tirunelveli district, Tamil Nadu, and is run by the Nuclear Power Corporation of India Limited (NPCIL). The other options are not the plant’s district: its own taluk, Radhapuram, lies in Tirunelveli district.
Analysis
Khyati Singh argues in The Hindu that the Kudankulam data leak shows India’s cyber rules bind the operator, not the contractors who hold its data. NPCIL says the material relates only to conventional Balance of Plant common service facilities.
Concept note
Kudankulam, in Radhapuram taluk of Tirunelveli district, Tamil Nadu, is run by the Nuclear Power Corporation of India Limited (NPCIL). Two 1,000 MWe pressurised water reactors (PWRs) operate there: Unit 1 has been in commercial operation since 31 December 2014 and Unit 2 since 31 March 2017.
NPCIL’s project pages describe Units 3 and 4 and Units 5 and 6, each pair of 2 x 1,000 MW, as under construction with technical cooperation from the Russian Federation; six such units make 6,000 MW. Map questions on nuclear sites test exactly this kind of placing: the plant, its State and district, its operator and its reactor type.
The plant has also become a case study in cyber security. In 2019, NPCIL said, CERT-In alerted it to malware on a PC in the internet-connected administrative network, which NPCIL said is isolated from the critical internal network; researchers identified the malware as Dtrack.
On the 2026 leak, Khyati Singh’s column argues that once project information passes to a contractor, its protection depends largely on contractual arrangements. Under the IT Act, 2000, the appropriate Government may notify a computer resource affecting critical information infrastructure as a protected system.
🎯 Concept Kit tap to expand
| 🔗 Cross-Paper Links | ** GS1 location of key industries and infrastructure; GS3 nuclear energy and the security of critical infrastructure; GS2 India-Russia cooperation. ** |
| ✍️ Mains Keywords | ** pressurised water reactor, nuclear power expansion, critical information infrastructure, supply-chain security. ** |
| ⚠️ Common Mistake | ** misplacing the plant’s district; Kudankulam is in Radhapuram taluk of Tirunelveli district. ** |
| 📌 Exam Tip | ** pair the plant with its operator (NPCIL), its reactor type (PWRs of 1,000 MWe for Units 1 and 2) and its partner for Units 3 to 6 (the Russian Federation). ** |
| 🎤 Interview | ** should a nuclear plant’s data held by contractors be governed by the same rules as the plant itself? |
Performance
Question-wise Result