UPSC Prelims Practice
Current Affairs Quiz 6 September 2026
Daily Practice
Test Your Knowledge
16 questions based on today’s current affairs & editorials
16 MCQs
Explanations
Statistics
Timed
Choose number of questions
Question 1 of 16
With reference to the "Correct the Map" resolution adopted by the UN General Assembly in September 2026, consider the following statements.
1 It bans the use of the Mercator projection by member states.
2 It encourages the use of the Equal Earth projection and other equal-area projections.
3 It asks that the limitations of any flat map in representing a spherical planet be taught.
Which of the statements given above are correct?
1 It bans the use of the Mercator projection by member states.
2 It encourages the use of the Equal Earth projection and other equal-area projections.
3 It asks that the limitations of any flat map in representing a spherical planet be taught.
Which of the statements given above are correct?
FACT: The resolution, adopted on 4 September 2026 by 164 votes to 1 with 6 abstentions, encourages governments, schools, international organisations and technology companies to use Equal Earth and other equal-area projections where relative size matters, and asks that the limits of every flat map be taught. ANALYSIS: Statement 1 is incorrect.
The resolution neither bans Mercator nor mandates a replacement. General Assembly resolutions of this kind are recommendatory and create no legal obligation.
The resolution neither bans Mercator nor mandates a replacement. General Assembly resolutions of this kind are recommendatory and create no legal obligation.
📝 Concept Note
The resolution was led at the UN by Togo, backing a campaign run by Speak Up Africa and Africa No Filter in partnership with the African Union. This was the first occasion on which a pan-African institution took an official position on the visual representation of the continent.
The United States was the sole member state to vote against.
The United States was the sole member state to vote against.
🎯 Concept Kit — tap to expand
| 🔗 Cross-Paper Links | ** GS1 (map projections, physical geography); GS2 (UN General Assembly, global groupings). ** |
| ✍️ Mains Keywords | ** equal-area projection, hortatory resolution, representation and power. ** |
| ⚠️ Common Mistake | ** Reading an encouraging resolution as a binding prohibition. ** |
| 📌 Exam Tip | ** UPSC repeatedly tests whether an international instrument is binding or recommendatory. ** |
| 🎤 Interview | ** Is a map projection a technical choice or a political one? |
Question 2 of 16
Which one of the following pairs of map projection properties can never be satisfied simultaneously by a single map projection?
FACT: Conformality, the preservation of local shape and angles, and equivalence, the preservation of area, are mathematically incompatible. No projection can be both.
ANALYSIS: This follows from the fact that a sphere has Gaussian curvature and a plane does not, so no transformation between them preserves all metric properties. Every projection is therefore a decision about what to sacrifice.
ANALYSIS: This follows from the fact that a sphere has Gaussian curvature and a plane does not, so no transformation between them preserves all metric properties. Every projection is therefore a decision about what to sacrifice.
📝 Concept Note
Tissot’s indicatrix visualises this. Small circles of equal size drawn on the globe stay circular but change size on a conformal map, and keep their area but flatten into ellipses on an equal-area map.
Mercator, a conformal projection, exaggerates area by the square of the secant of the latitude, which is about 4 times at 60 degrees and about 15 times at 75 degrees.
Mercator, a conformal projection, exaggerates area by the square of the secant of the latitude, which is about 4 times at 60 degrees and about 15 times at 75 degrees.
🎯 Concept Kit — tap to expand
| 🔗 Cross-Paper Links | ** GS1 (fundamentals of maps and projections). ** |
| ✍️ Mains Keywords | ** conformal, equivalent, Tissot''s indicatrix, Gaussian curvature. ** |
| ⚠️ Common Mistake | ** Believing some modern projection has solved the trade-off. None has, because it is a theorem, not a limitation of technique. ** |
| 📌 Exam Tip | ** Learn which property each named projection preserves; that is the form the question takes. ** |
| 🎤 Interview | ** Why do web maps still use Mercator when its area distortion is known? |
Question 3 of 16
The Equal Earth projection, endorsed by the UN General Assembly in 2026, is best described as
FACT: Equal Earth is an equal-area pseudocylindrical projection developed in 2018 by Bojan Savric, Tom Patterson and Bernhard Jenny, and adopted soon afterwards by the NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies. ANALYSIS: Option (a) describes Mercator, option (b) describes Winkel Tripel and option (c) describes Gall’s orthographic projection of 1855, later presented by Arno Peters in 1973 as the Peters world map.
📝 Concept Note
Equal Earth was created as a direct response to the Boston Public Schools’ adoption of the Gall-Peters projection in March 2017. Gall-Peters is equal-area but distorts shape severely.
Equal Earth was engineered to be equal-area while resembling the Robinson projection, whose proportions readers find visually natural, and its equations are deliberately simple and fast to evaluate.
Equal Earth was engineered to be equal-area while resembling the Robinson projection, whose proportions readers find visually natural, and its equations are deliberately simple and fast to evaluate.
🎯 Concept Kit — tap to expand
| 🔗 Cross-Paper Links | ** GS1 (map projections); GS2 (institutional adoption of standards). ** |
| ✍️ Mains Keywords | ** pseudocylindrical, equal-area, Gall-Peters, Robinson. ** |
| ⚠️ Common Mistake | ** Treating Robinson and Winkel Tripel as equal-area. Both are compromise projections and preserve nothing exactly. ** |
| 📌 Exam Tip | ** Pair each projection with its year, type and preserved property. ** |
| 🎤 Interview | ** Should school atlases carry more than one projection of the same world? |
Question 4 of 16
In 1989 and 1990, seven North American geographic organisations adopted a resolution concerning world maps. What did that resolution do?
FACT: The resolution rejected all rectangular world maps for general use, a category that includes both the Mercator and the Gall-Peters projections, on the ground that rectangular projections inevitably distort severely at the corners. ANALYSIS: The cartographic profession did not defend Mercator against Peters.
It rejected both, on technical grounds applying equally to each. The North American Cartographic Information Society declined to endorse the resolution.
It rejected both, on technical grounds applying equally to each. The North American Cartographic Information Society declined to endorse the resolution.
📝 Concept Note
James Gall published the orthographic cylindrical equal-area projection in 1855. Arno Peters presented the same projection as his own in 1973, having devised it in 1967, and claimed it was the first map to show the world fairly.
Cartographers objected both to the lack of acknowledgement of Gall’s priority and to the substitution of one extreme distortion for another. Equal Earth, arriving in 2018, is the constructive answer: equal-area but not rectangular.
Cartographers objected both to the lack of acknowledgement of Gall’s priority and to the substitution of one extreme distortion for another. Equal Earth, arriving in 2018, is the constructive answer: equal-area but not rectangular.
🎯 Concept Kit — tap to expand
| 🔗 Cross-Paper Links | ** GS1 (history of cartography); GS4 (attribution and intellectual honesty). ** |
| ✍️ Mains Keywords | ** Peters controversy, rectangular projections, cartographic ethics. ** |
| ⚠️ Common Mistake | ** Framing the debate as Mercator versus Peters when the profession rejected both. ** |
| 📌 Exam Tip | ** This detail separates a shallow answer from an informed one on the map question. ** |
| 🎤 Interview | ** Was Peters right in his politics even if wrong in his cartography? |
Question 5 of 16
The Indian Space Policy 2023 assigns roles among space sector bodies. Which one of the following statements is correct?
FACT: The Indian Space Policy 2023, approved by the Union Cabinet on 6 April 2023 and released on 20 April 2023, provides that ISRO shall not undertake operational and production work for the space sector and shall focus on developing new technologies, new systems and research and development. ANALYSIS: Options (a) and (c) reverse the roles.
IN-SPACe is the interface and authorisation body; NSIL is the public sector undertaking operating in demand-driven mode.
IN-SPACe is the interface and authorisation body; NSIL is the public sector undertaking operating in demand-driven mode.
📝 Concept Note
This is why the ISRO employee associations’ letter of 4 September 2026 is answered in part by existing policy. The direction described by IN-SPACe chairperson Pawan Goenka on 21 August 2026 has had Cabinet approval since 2023.
What has not been published is the timeline and the workforce transition plan, which is the substance of the associations’ concern. ISRO has transferred around 120 technologies to industry, including the SSLV and the PSLV.
What has not been published is the timeline and the workforce transition plan, which is the substance of the associations’ concern. ISRO has transferred around 120 technologies to industry, including the SSLV and the PSLV.
🎯 Concept Kit — tap to expand
| 🔗 Cross-Paper Links | ** GS3 (space technology, indigenisation); GS2 (regulatory bodies, policy implementation). ** |
| ✍️ Mains Keywords | ** IN-SPACe, NSIL, anchor customer, technology transfer. ** |
| ⚠️ Common Mistake | ** Confusing IN-SPACe with NSIL. They have different functions and different legal characters. ** |
| 📌 Exam Tip | ** The 2020 opening of the sector and the 2023 policy that codified roles are separate dates. ** |
| 🎤 Interview | ** Should a state retain sovereign launch capability even when private providers are cheaper? |
Question 6 of 16
EOS-05, launched by ISRO in September 2026, is significant because it is
FACT: EOS-05, weighing 2,367 kg, was launched by GSLV-F17 at 02:55 IST on 4 September 2026 from the Second Launch Pad at Satish Dhawan Space Centre, Sriharikota, into a sub-geosynchronous transfer orbit. It is India’s first imaging satellite designed to operate from geosynchronous orbit.
ANALYSIS: It was the 19th flight of the GSLV and the heaviest satellite the launcher has carried.
ANALYSIS: It was the 19th flight of the GSLV and the heaviest satellite the launcher has carried.
📝 Concept Note
An imaging satellite in geosynchronous orbit can stare continuously at the same region rather than revisiting it on each pass, which is valuable for weather, disaster monitoring and persistent surveillance, at the cost of lower spatial resolution from a far greater altitude. Speaking after the mission, ISRO chairperson V. Narayanan said the agency was working towards the first uncrewed Gaganyaan flight before the end of 2026.
🎯 Concept Kit — tap to expand
| 🔗 Cross-Paper Links | ** GS3 (space technology, Earth observation). ** |
| ✍️ Mains Keywords | ** geosynchronous imaging, sub-GTO, persistent observation. ** |
| ⚠️ Common Mistake | ** Confusing sub-geosynchronous transfer orbit with geosynchronous orbit. EOS-05 was placed in the former. ** |
| 📌 Exam Tip | ** Kulasekarapattinam in Thoothukudi district is India''s second spaceport, being built primarily for SSLV launches. ** |
| 🎤 Interview | ** What does persistent geostationary imaging add to India''s disaster response? |
Question 7 of 16
Consider the following statements about the September 2026 agreement on lethal autonomous weapons systems reached in Geneva.
1 It was reached by consensus among 128 High Contracting Parties to the Convention on Certain Conventional Weapons.
2 It is a legally binding treaty.
3 The CCW Seventh Review Conference in November 2026 will consider whether to move towards a treaty.
Which of the statements given above are correct?
1 It was reached by consensus among 128 High Contracting Parties to the Convention on Certain Conventional Weapons.
2 It is a legally binding treaty.
3 The CCW Seventh Review Conference in November 2026 will consider whether to move towards a treaty.
Which of the statements given above are correct?
FACT: On 5 September 2026 the Group of Governmental Experts under the CCW reached consensus among 128 High Contracting Parties on a document addressing lethal autonomous weapons systems, after more than a decade of talks. The CCW Seventh Review Conference is scheduled for November 2026.
ANALYSIS: Statement 2 is incorrect. The document is non-binding.
UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres and the ICRC issued a joint appeal for the November conference to begin negotiating a legally binding instrument.
ANALYSIS: Statement 2 is incorrect. The document is non-binding.
UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres and the ICRC issued a joint appeal for the November conference to begin negotiating a legally binding instrument.
📝 Concept Note
The CCW operates by consensus, which means any single High Contracting Party can block an outcome. This procedural fact explains both why the text took more than ten years and why campaigners say the definition and the civilian-protection measures were diluted.
Precedent exists for anticipatory prohibition: CCW Protocol IV banned blinding laser weapons in 1995, before their deployment.
Precedent exists for anticipatory prohibition: CCW Protocol IV banned blinding laser weapons in 1995, before their deployment.
🎯 Concept Kit — tap to expand
| 🔗 Cross-Paper Links | ** GS2 (international institutions, treaties); GS3 (security, emerging technology); GS4 (ethics of autonomous force). ** |
| ✍️ Mains Keywords | ** meaningful human control, accountability gap, Protocol IV, Article 36 reviews. ** |
| ⚠️ Common Mistake | ** Describing the consensus text as a treaty or as binding. ** |
| 📌 Exam Tip | ** Article 36 of Additional Protocol I, 1977 requires legal review of new weapons. ** |
| 🎤 Interview | ** Can moral responsibility be assigned when a machine selects the target? |
Question 8 of 16
Which one of the following most accurately describes India’s stated position on lethal autonomous weapons systems?
FACT: India’s position, as set out in its statements to the CCW and the UN General Assembly First Committee, is that the rules and principles of international humanitarian law take a technology-neutral approach and therefore already offer a sufficient framework for regulating LAWS. India regards the CCW as the appropriate forum, balancing military necessity against humanitarian imperatives. ANALYSIS: Option (a) is factually wrong.
India chaired the GGE in 2017 and 2018, when the eleven guiding principles on LAWS were developed.
India chaired the GGE in 2017 and 2018, when the eleven guiding principles on LAWS were developed.
📝 Concept Note
The campaign coalition Stop Killer Robots named the United States, Russia, India and Israel among key opponents of formal negotiations. That is a characterisation by an advocacy group, not an official record, and should be attributed as such.
India’s reluctance concerns the necessity of a new binding instrument, not the applicability of regulation. India also has a direct operational interest in autonomous surveillance and reconnaissance systems along difficult and remote border terrain.
India’s reluctance concerns the necessity of a new binding instrument, not the applicability of regulation. India also has a direct operational interest in autonomous surveillance and reconnaissance systems along difficult and remote border terrain.
🎯 Concept Kit — tap to expand
| 🔗 Cross-Paper Links | ** GS2 (India and international regimes); GS3 (internal and border security). ** |
| ✍️ Mains Keywords | ** technology-neutral IHL, military necessity, humanitarian imperative. ** |
| ⚠️ Common Mistake | ** Reproducing an NGO''s label as a statement of official Indian policy. ** |
| 📌 Exam Tip | ** Distinguish opposition to a new treaty from opposition to regulation. ** |
| 🎤 Interview | ** Does India''s border security situation justify its position on autonomous systems? |
Question 9 of 16
The National Teachers Awards conferred on 5 September 2026 were given to 82 educators. The composition of the awardees was
FACT: President Droupadi Murmu conferred the awards at Vigyan Bhawan on 82 educators: 48 from the Department of School Education and Literacy, 21 from higher educational institutions and polytechnics, and 13 skill trainers from the Ministry of Skill Development and Entrepreneurship. ANALYSIS: The 48 school teachers came from 27 states, 7 Union Territories and 6 Central Government organisations, and comprised 26 men and 22 women.
📝 Concept Note
Selection runs through a three-stage district, state and national process operated online by the Department of School Education and Literacy. The commonly quoted figure of 50 school teachers belongs to the older, school-education-only format of the award.
Union Education Minister Pralhad Joshi attended, having taken additional charge of the portfolio on 26 July 2026.
Union Education Minister Pralhad Joshi attended, having taken additional charge of the portfolio on 26 July 2026.
🎯 Concept Kit — tap to expand
| 🔗 Cross-Paper Links | ** GS2 (education policy, social sector schemes); GS1 (society and education). ** |
| ✍️ Mains Keywords | ** NEP 2020, teacher professional development, National Professional Standards for Teachers. ** |
| ⚠️ Common Mistake | ** Quoting the older 50-teacher figure for the current award. ** |
| 📌 Exam Tip | ** Awards and their composition are standard Prelims one-liners. ** |
| 🎤 Interview | ** Can systems be designed to make exceptional teaching routine rather than award-worthy? |
Question 10 of 16
In September 2026, which state became the first in India to formally recognise a separate honorific for teachers?
FACT: Karnataka issued Government Order 216 E SLB 2026 on 5 September 2026, through the Department of School Education and Literacy, permitting all teachers in the state to prefix “Tr”, for Teacher-Shikshaka, to their names, on the lines of “Dr” for doctors. ANALYSIS: Karnataka is the first state in India to formally recognise a separate honorific for the teaching profession.
📝 Concept Note
The order cites teachers’ contributions ranging from career guidance and instilling confidence in students to upholding constitutional values and building a scientific temper, and records that teachers had themselves long sought such a prefix. Chief Minister D. K. Shivakumar, speaking at Kudligi, said Karnataka has more than 4.5 lakh teachers.
The honorific is granted by executive order and is a state-level, not statutory or national, recognition.
The honorific is granted by executive order and is a state-level, not statutory or national, recognition.
🎯 Concept Kit — tap to expand
| 🔗 Cross-Paper Links | ** GS2 (state government functioning, education administration). ** |
| ✍️ Mains Keywords | ** professional recognition, executive order, scientific temper under Article 51A(h). ** |
| ⚠️ Common Mistake | ** Assuming the title has statutory or national force. ** |
| 📌 Exam Tip | ** Note the distinction between a government order and legislation. ** |
| 🎤 Interview | ** Does an honorific change professional status, or only its symbolism? |
Question 11 of 16
With reference to the India-China Expert Level Mechanism on Trans-border Rivers, consider the following statements.
1 It was established by a Joint Declaration in 2006.
2 It is a legally binding treaty governing the sharing of Brahmaputra waters.
3 China has not provided hydrological data on the Brahmaputra to India since June 2023.
Which of the statements given above are correct?
1 It was established by a Joint Declaration in 2006.
2 It is a legally binding treaty governing the sharing of Brahmaputra waters.
3 China has not provided hydrological data on the Brahmaputra to India since June 2023.
Which of the statements given above are correct?
FACT: The Expert Level Mechanism was established through a Joint Declaration in 2006 and provides for flood-season hydrological data and emergency communication. Indian officials have said China has not provided Brahmaputra hydrological data since June 2023.
ANALYSIS: Statement 2 is incorrect. The ELM is a consultative mechanism, not a legally binding treaty.
No comprehensive India-China water treaty exists.
ANALYSIS: Statement 2 is incorrect. The ELM is a consultative mechanism, not a legally binding treaty.
No comprehensive India-China water treaty exists.
📝 Concept Note
India raised trans-border rivers at the 36th Working Mechanism for Consultation and Coordination meeting in New Delhi on 6 August 2026 and pressed for an early ELM meeting; the two sides agreed to convene it in September 2026. The UN Watercourses Convention, 1997, which codifies equitable and reasonable utilisation and the no-significant-harm obligation, binds neither party: China voted against it and India has not ratified it.
🎯 Concept Kit — tap to expand
| 🔗 Cross-Paper Links | ** GS2 (India and its neighbourhood); GS3 (disaster management, water resources); GS1 (Brahmaputra system). ** |
| ✍️ Mains Keywords | ** upper riparian, no-harm rule, equitable utilisation, sediment load. ** |
| ⚠️ Common Mistake | ** Assuming a treaty governs India-China river waters, as the Indus Waters Treaty does with Pakistan. ** |
| 📌 Exam Tip | ** The concern is flow timing, lean-season releases and sediment, not the river being cut off. ** |
| 🎤 Interview | ** How should India build resilience against an upstream information vacuum? |
Question 12 of 16
The Yarlung Zangbo Lower Reaches Hydropower Project announced by China has a planned installed capacity of
FACT: The project comprises five cascade hydropower stations with a planned installed capacity of 60 GW and projected annual generation of about 300 billion kWh, roughly three times the Three Gorges Dam. Announced investment is about 1.2 trillion yuan, some $167 billion.
ANALYSIS: Premier Li Qiang announced the start of construction at Nyingchi on 19 July 2025, calling it “the project of the century”. Completion is expected around 2033.
ANALYSIS: Premier Li Qiang announced the start of construction at Nyingchi on 19 July 2025, calling it “the project of the century”. Completion is expected around 2033.
📝 Concept Note
Water is to be diverted at the Great Bend near Namcha Barwa into a tunnel of about 40 km, its descending force driving five 12 GW powerhouses before rejoining the river. The project is described as run-of-the-river but involves a reservoir, likely near Mainling.
It is being built in the eastern Himalayan syntaxis, a highly seismically active zone that produced the 1950 Assam-Tibet earthquake. It is implemented by the state-owned China Yajiang Group.
It is being built in the eastern Himalayan syntaxis, a highly seismically active zone that produced the 1950 Assam-Tibet earthquake. It is implemented by the state-owned China Yajiang Group.
🎯 Concept Kit — tap to expand
| 🔗 Cross-Paper Links | ** GS1 (Himalayan geomorphology, drainage); GS2 (bilateral relations); GS3 (energy, disaster risk). ** |
| ✍️ Mains Keywords | ** Great Bend, run-of-the-river, cascade stations, seismic risk. ** |
| ⚠️ Common Mistake | ** Treating "run-of-the-river" as meaning no reservoir. ** |
| 📌 Exam Tip | ** Zangmu, on the middle reaches and operating since construction began in 2010, is a separate project. ** |
| 🎤 Interview | ** Should India accelerate the Siang project as a counter-storage measure despite local opposition? |
Question 13 of 16
Consider the following statements about India’s LPG supply in 2026.
1 India imports about 60 per cent of the LPG it consumes.
2 The share of Gulf suppliers in India’s LPG imports fell from about 81 per cent in February 2026 to about 16 per cent in May 2026.
3 India is the world’s largest consumer of LPG.
Which of the statements given above are correct?
1 India imports about 60 per cent of the LPG it consumes.
2 The share of Gulf suppliers in India’s LPG imports fell from about 81 per cent in February 2026 to about 16 per cent in May 2026.
3 India is the world’s largest consumer of LPG.
Which of the statements given above are correct?
FACT: India imports about 60 per cent of its LPG consumption. The Gulf share, comprising the UAE, Saudi Arabia, Kuwait and Qatar, fell from about 81 per cent in February 2026 to about 16 per cent in May 2026, while the US share rose from about 14 per cent to about 55 per cent over the same period and to about 67 per cent by August.
ANALYSIS: Statement 3 is incorrect. India is the world’s second largest LPG consumer, after China.
ANALYSIS: Statement 3 is incorrect. India is the world’s second largest LPG consumer, after China.
📝 Concept Note
India had about 332.1 million active domestic LPG connections and about 104.29 million Pradhan Mantri Ujjwala Yojana connections as of January 2026. LPG consumption fell about 13.1 per cent in April 2026 amid supply disruption and affordability stress.
James Rockall of the World Liquid Gas Association cautioned that US supply is not a complete solution because much American output is committed under long-term term contracts, and urged India to expand storage and manage freight costs directly.
James Rockall of the World Liquid Gas Association cautioned that US supply is not a complete solution because much American output is committed under long-term term contracts, and urged India to expand storage and manage freight costs directly.
🎯 Concept Kit — tap to expand
| 🔗 Cross-Paper Links | ** GS3 (energy security, infrastructure); GS2 (welfare schemes, external influences on Indian interests). ** |
| ✍️ Mains Keywords | ** Strait of Hormuz, term contracts, FOB pricing, strategic storage. ** |
| ⚠️ Common Mistake | ** Confusing LPG with LNG. They are different commodities with different supplier sets. ** |
| 📌 Exam Tip | ** The 67 per cent US figure is a share of imports, not of total consumption. ** |
| 🎤 Interview | ** Should India build a strategic LPG reserve on the model of its crude oil reserves? |
Question 14 of 16
Under India’s tax framework for Virtual Digital Assets, which one of the following is correct?
FACT: Section 115BBH imposes a flat 30 per cent tax on gains from the transfer of a Virtual Digital Asset, plus surcharge and 4 per cent cess, and permits deduction only of the cost of acquisition. ANALYSIS: Losses cannot be set off against any other income, including gains on a different digital asset, and cannot be carried forward.
There is no distinction between short-term and long-term holdings. The 1 per cent TDS under Section 194S is a withholding mechanism, not the tax itself.
There is no distinction between short-term and long-term holdings. The 1 per cent TDS under Section 194S is a withholding mechanism, not the tax itself.
📝 Concept Note
India taxes crypto and polices it for money laundering without legalising, regulating or banning it. In March 2023 VDA service providers were designated Reporting Entities under the Prevention of Money-Laundering Act, making FIU-IND registration mandatory; 54 exchanges and VDA service providers were registered as of July 2026.
A senior SEBI official has said the regulator can do little until the government decides whether crypto is a currency or an asset.
A senior SEBI official has said the regulator can do little until the government decides whether crypto is a currency or an asset.
🎯 Concept Kit — tap to expand
| 🔗 Cross-Paper Links | ** GS3 (Indian economy, money and banking, IT awareness). ** |
| ✍️ Mains Keywords | ** Section 115BBH, Section 194S, PMLA reporting entity, IMF-FSB Synthesis Paper. ** |
| ⚠️ Common Mistake | ** Treating the 1 per cent TDS as the tax rate. ** |
| 📌 Exam Tip | ** The digital rupee, the RBI''s CBDC, is a sovereign liability and is not a cryptocurrency. ** |
| 🎤 Interview | ** Is taxing without regulating a coherent long-term position? |
Question 15 of 16
The Legal Metrology (Indian Standard Time) Rules, 2026 notified in August 2026 do which of the following?
FACT: The Rules, notified by the Ministry of Consumer Affairs on 27 August 2026, make Indian Standard Time the single reference for legal, administrative, commercial and other official purposes across India, and come into force 180 days after publication in the Official Gazette. ANALYSIS: Option (d) is the opposite of the intent.
The Rules enable NavIC and other approved Indian timing sources precisely to reduce dependence on foreign satellite time sources such as GPS.
The Rules enable NavIC and other approved Indian timing sources precisely to reduce dependence on foreign satellite time sources such as GPS.
📝 Concept Note
IST is UTC plus 5 hours 30 minutes, based on the 82 degrees 30 minutes East meridian passing near Mirzapur, and is maintained by CSIR-National Physical Laboratory with traceability to UTC stated as better than 3 nanoseconds. In July 2026 the government commissioned a White Rabbit Technology-based IST Dissemination Demonstration Network at the Regional Reference Standard Laboratory, Bengaluru.
The enabling statute is the Legal Metrology Act, 2009.
The enabling statute is the Legal Metrology Act, 2009.
🎯 Concept Kit — tap to expand
| 🔗 Cross-Paper Links | ** GS3 (science and technology, critical infrastructure security); GS2 (statutory rule-making). ** |
| ✍️ Mains Keywords | ** NavIC, time sovereignty, GPS spoofing, critical infrastructure. ** |
| ⚠️ Common Mistake | ** Confusing this with the long-standing proposal for a second Indian time zone, which remains unadopted. ** |
| 📌 Exam Tip | ** Note the 180-day commencement window; the Rules are notified but not yet in force. ** |
| 🎤 Interview | ** Why is dependence on a foreign time signal a national security concern? |
Question 16 of 16
With reference to India’s Javelin anti-tank guided missile procurement announced in August 2026, which one of the following is correct?
FACT: The Indian Army signed a Letter of Offer and Acceptance under the US Foreign Military Sales programme covering 25 Lightweight Command Launch Units and 60 missiles. ANALYSIS: Option (b) overstates the position.
On 30 August 2026 the Javelin Joint Venture signed a memorandum of understanding with Tata Advanced Systems Limited only to explore establishing a final assembly and integration facility. Option (c) is wrong: the Javelin is a fire-and-forget missile with an imaging infrared seeker that locks on before launch.
On 30 August 2026 the Javelin Joint Venture signed a memorandum of understanding with Tata Advanced Systems Limited only to explore establishing a final assembly and integration facility. Option (c) is wrong: the Javelin is a fire-and-forget missile with an imaging infrared seeker that locks on before launch.
📝 Concept Note
Under the framework discussed, sub-assembly kits and guidance electronics units would be produced in the United States and shipped to India for final assembly, leaving the critical seeker and guidance technology abroad. The Javelin Joint Venture is between Lockheed Martin and RTX, the parent company of Raytheon.
India continues to pursue the DRDO Man Portable Anti-Tank Guided Missile and operates the Israeli Spike in limited numbers.
India continues to pursue the DRDO Man Portable Anti-Tank Guided Missile and operates the Israeli Spike in limited numbers.
🎯 Concept Kit — tap to expand
| 🔗 Cross-Paper Links | ** GS3 (defence indigenisation, security); GS2 (India-US relations). ** |
| ✍️ Mains Keywords | ** fire-and-forget, top-attack, Foreign Military Sales, technology depth. ** |
| ⚠️ Common Mistake | ** Reading an MoU to explore co-production as a concluded manufacturing contract. ** |
| 📌 Exam Tip | ** Distinguish announced intent, a signed LoA, and an executed production contract. UPSC tests this distinction. ** |
| 🎤 Interview | ** Does licensed final assembly advance self-reliance, or substitute for it? |
–
/ 16
Performance
✓
Correct
0
✗
Incorrect
0
%
Accuracy
0%
⏱
Time Taken
–
Question-wise Result
Daily quiz questions on Telegram
Practice polls with instant explanations, plus every edition and free PDFs
Join Channel