Should India's 4 Per Cent Inflation Target Move If the World's Inflation Has?

Resources for this Article

Download PDF Print-ready A4 notes · Free

The Lift Line

If India’s 4 per cent target is really “2 per cent plus Balassa-Samuelson”, then a world stuck at 3 per cent asks an uncomfortable question.

Why This Editorial Matters for Your Exam

Flexible inflation targeting (FIT) is a GS3 core topic, and the target is reviewed every five years. This column gives the one thing most answers lack: an explanation of why the number is 4, through the Balassa-Samuelson effect and the Urjit Patel committee’s reasoning, and then asks whether it should change. It also explains why rate hikes may not bite when liquidity is in surplus.

GS Paper 3: Indian economy: monetary policy; inflation; mobilisation of resources; effects of global developments.

Concept	Meaning	Why it is testable
Flexible inflation targeting	The central bank targets inflation within a band, while considering growth	India’s framework since 2016
Balassa-Samuelson effect	Fast productivity growth in traded goods raises wages and prices of non-traded services, so fast-growing economies run higher inflation	Explains the gap between India’s target and advanced economies’
Operating target	The short-term rate the central bank steers day to day	In India, the weighted average call money rate (WACR)
Monetary transmission	How policy rate changes pass through to market rates	Weak when liquidity runs against the policy stance

Background and Context

India’s framework.

Element	Detail
Legal basis	RBI Act, 1934, amended by the Finance Act, 2016 (Section 45ZA and following)
Who sets the target	Central Government, in consultation with the RBI, once every five years
Target	4 per cent CPI inflation, band 2 to 6 per cent; retained for 2026-31 by a notification of 25 March 2026 (background)
Who sets the policy rate	Six-member Monetary Policy Committee (MPC): three from the RBI (the Governor chairs, with a casting vote) and three external members appointed by the Centre
Failure	Average inflation outside the band for three consecutive quarters; the RBI must report reasons and remedies to the government
Origin	Urjit Patel committee report (January 2014); Monetary Policy Framework Agreement (February 2015)

Why the MPC may hike now, as the author sets out.

1. Minutes of the last meeting showed members ready to raise rates once price pressures spread beyond a few sectors.
2. August CPI data showed a sharp spike, with pressures spreading beyond food and transport.
3. Global rates are rising; only 1.25 percentage points separate India’s repo rate from the top of the US federal funds target band.

The liquidity problem. The money market is awash with liquidity, largely from the RBI’s dollar-rupee swap on FCNR(B) deposits. Because the RBI’s operating target is the weighted average call money rate, rate hikes transmit best when liquidity is tight; the RBI may need bond sales (open market operations) to drain the surplus.

The Analysis

1. Where the 4 comes from. One reading of the Urjit Patel committee’s target: 2 per cent, the inflation advanced economies aim for, plus 2 percentage points for the Balassa-Samuelson effect. Emerging economies grow faster in their traded sectors, which pushes up wages and the prices of non-traded services, so their inflation runs higher even with equally disciplined monetary policy.

2. The committee’s own test. The committee said that inflation in a country’s major trading partners matters when setting its target, “consistent with its broader integration in the global economy”.

3. The world has moved. Average US inflation since June 2023 has been about 3 per cent, a full point above the Federal Reserve’s aim; Europe is similar; China is the exception. If advanced-economy inflation has shifted up by a point, the logic of the formula would shift India’s target up by a point too.

4. Why not rush. The author is clear: an inflation anchor “should not be changed often”, and other studies of the inflation rate that maximises India’s growth also support 4 per cent. The question is raised “to provoke discussion rather than argue for any hasty change”.

5. What a change would mean. A higher target would shift the macro policy mix towards looser monetary and tighter fiscal policy. The trigger to revisit would be a lasting new world of higher inflation, from lax fiscal policies, geopolitical shocks and protectionism.

The precision that earns marks. Name the three layers correctly: the target (4 per cent CPI, set by the government), the instrument (repo rate, set by the MPC), and the operating target (WACR). Many answers mix them up.

Data and Institutions Vault

Prelims-grade facts:

The framework:

• India’s inflation target is 4 per cent CPI inflation, with a band of 2 to 6 per cent, retained for 2026-31 (notified 25 March 2026).
• The target is set by the Central Government in consultation with the RBI, once every five years (Section 45ZA, RBI Act).
• Statutory inflation targeting came through the Finance Act, 2016, amending the RBI Act, 1934.
• The MPC has six members; the RBI Governor chairs it and has a casting vote.
• Failure means average inflation outside the band for three consecutive quarters.
• The Urjit Patel committee reported in January 2014; the Monetary Policy Framework Agreement was signed in February 2015.
• The RBI’s operating target is the weighted average call money rate (WACR).

Prelims, the traps:

• The government, not the RBI or the MPC, sets the inflation target.
• The target is on CPI (combined) inflation, not WPI.
• The Balassa-Samuelson effect explains higher inflation in fast-growing economies; it is not about exchange-rate pass-through.
• The three external MPC members are appointed by the Central Government, for four years.

⚠️ Watch the trap: Surplus liquidity weakens the effect of a repo rate hike, because market rates stay below the policy rate. That is why the RBI may pair hikes with open market sales of bonds.

The Debate

Keep 4 per cent. Credibility is the whole point of an anchor. Changing it after a spike would signal that the target follows inflation rather than the other way round, and higher inflation hurts the poor, pensioners and savers most.

Be open to 5 per cent. The target was built on assumptions about global inflation that may no longer hold. A target set too low for the new world forces tighter policy than necessary, at a cost to growth and jobs.

The balanced verdict. Hold the target through the current spike; use the band as intended; and, since the target was reset only in March 2026 for 2026-31, let the next five-yearly review examine, with evidence, whether global inflation has shifted structurally.

How to Think About This

Ask what assumptions a number rests on. Targets such as 4 per cent inflation, 3 per cent fiscal deficit or 60 per cent debt-to-GDP are built on assumptions about growth, global conditions and trade-offs. When the assumptions change, the target deserves review; when only the data are noisy, it does not. Separating the two is the analytical move that turns a list of opinions into an argument.

Diagram-in-Words

Takeaway Box

• Target: 4 per cent CPI, band 2 to 6, set by the government every five years; MPC sets the repo rate.
• Logic: 2 per cent (advanced economies) plus about 2 points (Balassa-Samuelson), per one reading of the Urjit Patel committee.
• The shift: US inflation has averaged about 3 per cent since June 2023.
• Near term: a rate hike is expected, but surplus liquidity from FCNR(B) swaps may blunt it.
• Verdict: no hasty change; a question for the next review.

Sources: Mint, Views page, 23 September 2026 (print edition)

Source: Should India's 4 Per Cent Inflation Target Move If the World's Inflation Has? — Ujiyari.com | Free UPSC & State PCS Editorial Analysis

Key Arguments at a Glance

Niranjan Rajadhyaksha argues that because India’s 4 per cent inflation target can be read as advanced-economy inflation of 2 per cent plus about 2 percentage points for the Balassa-Samuelson effect, a lasting rise in inflation abroad raises the question, to be debated rather than rushed, of whether India’s target should also rise in the future.

✓ Supporting

• Markets expect the Monetary Policy Committee to raise the repo rate soon, perhaps at its October meeting: minutes show members ready to act once price pressures spread, August inflation spiked and spread beyond food and transport, and global rates are rising, with only 1.25 percentage points now separating India’s repo rate and the top of the US federal funds band.
• Surplus liquidity, swollen by the RBI’s dollar-rupee swap on FCNR(B) deposits, could blunt rate hikes, because the operating target is the weighted average call money rate and transmission works best when liquidity matches the policy stance; RBI may need bond sales to absorb it.
• The Urjit Patel committee (January 2014) said a country’s target should reflect inflation in major trading partners, consistent with its global integration.
• Average US inflation since June 2023 has been about 3 per cent, a full point above the Federal Reserve’s aim, with Europe similar and China the exception.

⚠ Counter

An inflation anchor should not be changed often, and studies of the growth-maximising inflation rate for India support the current 4 per cent; raising the target could unanchor expectations and hurt the poor, who hold cash and have no inflation hedge.

→ Way Forward

No hasty change, but a debate: if lax fiscal policy, geopolitical shocks and protectionism lift global inflation for good, India may in future need to consider a higher target, which would imply looser monetary and tighter fiscal policy.