PM-SETU 5th National Steering Committee Approves ₹735 Crore for 3 ITI Clusters

🗞️ Why in News The 5th National Steering Committee (NSC) of PM-SETU (Pradhan Mantri Skilling and Employability Transformation through Upgraded ITIs), chaired by Ministry of Skill Development and Entrepreneurship (MSDE) Secretary Debashree Mukherjee, on 8 September 2026 approved three cluster Strategic Investment Plans (SIPs) totalling ₹735.70 crore, for Bhiwadi (Rajasthan), Medchal (Telangana) and Meerut (Uttar Pradesh). With this, cumulative sanction under the scheme reaches ₹2,171 crore across nine clusters.

What Was Approved on 8 September

The three cluster SIPs are structured on a hub-and-spoke model, each covering five ITIs anchored by a hub institute or an industry partner:

All three clusters follow the same design: a government ITI serves as the anchor institute and an external implementation partner commits to curriculum co-design, faculty training, equipment sponsorship, apprenticeship placements and outcome-linked delivery. Bhiwadi is partnered with H.G. Infra Engineering (anchor: Government ITI Bhiwadi), Medchal with ZEN Technologies (anchor: Government ITI Medchal) and Meerut with NSDC (anchor: Government ITI Saket). The mix of an infrastructure firm, a listed defence-technology firm and a national skilling body in a single round is the point of a mission that presents itself as an industry-led ITI transformation. Rajasthan became the first state to execute a Shareholders’ Agreement for its cluster.

What PM-SETU Is

PM-SETU was approved by the Union Cabinet in 2025 as a re-engineering of the Industrial Training Institute (ITI) ecosystem. The essentials are:

The scheme is India’s largest programme yet to modernise the ITI system, which sits at the base of the country’s formal vocational training pyramid. There are around 14,900 ITIs across the country, of which about 3,300 are government-run and the rest are private. Total intake capacity is approximately 27 lakh seats a year. That base has long been criticised on three counts: outdated trades, weak industry linkage, and poor placement outcomes. PM-SETU is designed as the structural response.

Why Clusters, and Why an Industry Anchor

The cluster design solves a specific problem. Individual ITIs are too small to justify a machine-tool investment for one trade; a five-ITI cluster with a hub, on the other hand, can amortise a shared advanced facility across a much larger student base and share instructors between institutes. The industry anchor, where one is designated, guarantees a placement pull at the far end of the training pipe. That combination is what the fifth NSC has now approved in Bhiwadi, Medchal and Meerut.

The Wider Skilling Architecture

PM-SETU sits inside a broader ecosystem that has been building since the Skill India Mission was launched on 15 July 2015 (also observed as World Youth Skills Day). The current architecture:

NEP 2020 alignment. The National Education Policy 2020 committed to integrating vocational training into mainstream schooling and higher education, with a target of at least 50 per cent of learners exposed to vocational education by 2025. PM-SETU strengthens the supply side of that pipeline by giving the ITI network a credible upgrade route.

The Labour-Market Reason for the Push

India’s demographic and labour-market data explain the political weight behind a ₹60,000-crore ITI programme.

The PLFS also carries a monthly urban series (Current Weekly Status, or CWS) for urban labour, providing a real-time view of unemployment. Read together, these numbers tell a consistent story: India’s problem is less headline unemployment than employability, formalisation and the female participation gap, precisely the levers a scaled ITI upgrade programme can move.

Cluster Placement in the Country’s Industrial Map

The three clusters approved on 8 September are not accidental picks:

• Bhiwadi sits inside the Delhi-Mumbai Industrial Corridor (DMIC) node of the National Capital Region, a manufacturing zone concentrated in electronics, automotive components and pharmaceuticals.
• Medchal lies on the northern edge of Hyderabad, an emerging defence-tech and aerospace cluster where ZEN Technologies, a Hyderabad-based simulator and anti-drone systems firm, is a natural industry anchor.
• Meerut is the largest urban node in western Uttar Pradesh, with sports goods, textiles and metal-fabrication trades that need a modernised skilling supply.

Placing a hub-and-spoke ITI cluster into each of these industrial ecosystems is meant to convert local demand into local employability rather than force distant migration.

UPSC Relevance

GS Paper 2. Welfare schemes for vulnerable sections of the population by the Centre and States; mechanisms, laws, institutions and bodies constituted for the protection and betterment of these sections.

GS Paper 3. Employment and inclusive growth; investment models; effects of liberalisation on the economy; human resource development.

The Mains framing. A weak answer will list schemes. A strong answer will show the stack: the National Council for Vocational Education and Training as the regulator, PM-SETU as the capital modernisation programme, PMKVY 4.0 as the short-course layer, NAPS as the apprenticeship layer, and the sector skill councils as the industry-facing curriculum bodies. It will then judge PM-SETU on whether it moves the outcomes that matter most, which are the placement rate, the female participation share in ITIs, the share of NSQF-aligned trades, and the employer-satisfaction signals from anchor industries.

A question worth preparing. “The Indian ITI system has been described as under-invested and disconnected from industry. Examine how PM-SETU addresses these gaps through its cluster-based, industry-anchored architecture, and identify the outcome indicators on which its success should be judged. (250 words)”

The GS2 counterpoint to hold. Reforms of federal-concurrent subjects require State steering committees to be as capable as the Central one, since ITIs are administered by State Directorates of Training. A ₹60,000-crore Central outlay is a supply-side push; without State-level absorptive capacity, industry co-financing, and trainer capacity, capital sanctioned is not the same as capability built.

📌 Facts Corner — Knowledgepedia

Prelims, statement-ready facts:

• The 5th NSC of PM-SETU on 8 September 2026 approved three cluster SIPs totalling ₹735.70 crore for Bhiwadi, Medchal and Meerut.
• The NSC was chaired by MSDE Secretary Debashree Mukherjee.
• Bhiwadi (Rajasthan) SIP is ₹241 crore, anchored by Government ITI Bhiwadi as hub.
• Medchal (Telangana) SIP is ₹254.30 crore, anchored by ZEN Technologies as industry partner.
• Meerut (UP) SIP is ₹240.40 crore, anchored by Government ITI Saket as hub.
• Cumulative PM-SETU sanction to date is ₹2,171 crore across 9 clusters.
• PM-SETU full form: Pradhan Mantri Skilling and Employability Transformation through Upgraded ITIs.
• PM-SETU total outlay is ₹60,000 crore; the scheme was approved by the Union Cabinet in 2025.
• The nodal Ministry is the Ministry of Skill Development and Entrepreneurship (MSDE).
• Skill India Mission was launched on 15 July 2015, also observed annually as World Youth Skills Day.
• India has around 14,900 ITIs with about 27 lakh annual intake capacity; about 3,300 are government-run.

Prelims, the traps:

• PM-SETU is the ITI modernisation scheme; do not confuse it with PM-Kaushal (PMKVY) or PM-DAKSH, which are separate programmes.
• MSDE is the nodal Ministry, not the Ministry of Education; ITIs sit under State Directorates of Training within the DGT ecosystem.
• The National Council for Vocational Education and Training (NCVET) was established in 2018 as a merged regulator; NCVT and SCVT still exist as trade-testing bodies.
• PMKVY is currently on version 4.0; it is a short-term certificate programme, not an ITI course.
• ZEN Technologies is a Hyderabad-based defence-tech firm anchoring the Medchal cluster; the anchor is not a government body.

Mains, arguments and keywords:

• Hub-and-spoke cluster design as a solution to sub-scale investment in individual ITIs.
• Industry-anchored ITIs as a placement-pull mechanism, and its trade-off with autonomy.
• Employability, formalisation and female participation as the real labour-market gaps behind the scheme.
• NEP 2020 alignment: 50 per cent of learners exposed to vocational education, integrated with mainstream schooling and higher education.
• Absorptive capacity of State Directorates of Training as the binding constraint on a Central-outlay programme.

Interview, be ready for:

• What are the outcome metrics on which a ₹60,000 crore ITI programme should be judged, and how would you audit them?
• How does NCVET’s regulatory role interact with the State Councils for Vocational Training and the sector skill councils?
• Why is female participation in the ITI stream historically low, and does the cluster model change that?
• Compare PM-SETU with the German dual apprenticeship model, and identify what is transferable and what is not.

Sources: PIB, The Hindu, Business Standard

Source: PM-SETU 5th National Steering Committee Approves ₹735 Crore for 3 ITI Clusters — Ujiyari.com | Free UPSC & State PCS Current Affairs