Context

The Hindu editorial examines the Nari Shakti Vandan Adhiniyam (106th Constitutional Amendment, 2023) providing for one-third reservation of seats for women in the Lok Sabha and State Legislative Assemblies. The editorial argues that the implementation — contingent on the delimitation exercise following the next Census — creates a structural tension between the urgency of improving women’s representation and the risks of population-based delimitation for federal balance, particularly north-south equity.


The Editorial Argument

1. The Implementation Trap

The 106th Amendment has an inherent paradox: its implementation requires delimitation, but delimitation based on updated population figures (Census 2021) will significantly increase the weight of populous northern states relative to southern states that have achieved demographic stabilisation. The editorial argues that rushing delimitation to fast-track women’s reservation may worsen north-south federal imbalances.

2. The North-South Delimitation Stakes

The 84th Amendment (2001) froze delimitation on 1971 Census figures. A new delimitation based on 2021 Census data would substantially shift Lok Sabha seats from:

  • Southern states (TN, Kerala, Andhra Pradesh, Karnataka, Telangana) — which achieved population stabilisation earlier due to better social development outcomes
  • To northern states (UP, MP, Bihar, Rajasthan) — which still have higher TFR (Total Fertility Rate)

The editorial notes that this creates perverse incentives — states that successfully implemented family planning face political marginalisation, while states that didn’t are rewarded with more parliamentary seats.

3. The Women’s Representation Case

Despite the implementation complexity, the editorial strongly endorses the underlying goal. Women constitute 50% of India’s population but have never crossed 15% representation in the Lok Sabha. Global average stands at approximately 27% (IPU 2025). Nordic countries average 45%+. The constitutional amendment is overdue.

4. What Needs to Happen

The editorial calls for:

  • Transparent Census and delimitation process with broad political consultation
  • Decoupling the delimitation for constituencies from the delimitation for reserved seats — the final reserved seat identification can happen after delimitation, without further delay
  • Consideration of increasing total Lok Sabha seats (Article 81 allows up to 550 elected members) to accommodate expansion without eliminating existing representation

Key Constitutional Provisions

Provision Details
84th Amendment (2001) Froze delimitation on 1971 Census until first census after 2026
Article 82 Delimitation after each Census
Article 81 Composition of Lok Sabha — max 550 elected members
Article 330A Women’s reservation in Lok Sabha (inserted by 106th Amendment)
Article 332A Women’s reservation in State Assemblies (inserted by 106th Amendment)
106th Amendment (2023) Nari Shakti Vandan Adhiniyam — 15-year initial reservation

UPSC Relevance

GS Paper 2 — Polity & Governance

  • Women’s representation in Parliament — international comparisons, India’s record
  • Delimitation and federal equity — north-south representation stakes
  • Relationship between Census, delimitation, and reservation

Mains Angle

“The 106th Constitutional Amendment represents a critical step but its implementation is fraught with federal equity concerns. Analyse.” (GS2)


Facts Corner

Item Fact
106th Amendment Nari Shakti Vandan Adhiniyam, September 2023
Articles inserted 330A (Lok Sabha), 332A (State Assemblies)
Reservation quantum One-third of total seats
Implementation trigger Delimitation following next Census
Lok Sabha women (current) 82 of 543 seats (~15%)
Global average (women in Parliament) ~27% (IPU 2025)
84th Amendment Froze delimitation on 1971 Census
Next delimitation estimated 2028-29 (post-Census 2025)
Max Lok Sabha seats (Article 81) 550 elected members
First TFR-stabilised states Southern India — Kerala, TN, AP, Karnataka