UPSC Prelims Practice
Current Affairs Quiz 24 August 2026
Test Your Knowledge
15 questions based on today’s current affairs & editorials
Choose number of questions
Question 1 of 15
Facts
National Space Day marks the Chandrayaan-3 Vikram lander touchdown near the lunar south polar region, achieved in 2023.
Analysis
State the achievement precisely. India was NOT the first country to soft-land on the Moon, it was the fourth. India was the first to soft-land NEAR THE SOUTH POLE, which is the claim that matters, because permanently shadowed craters in that region are suspected to hold water ice.
Concept note
The 2026 edition was the third, with the national event hosted by ISRO’s Space Applications Centre at Ahmedabad on 23 August 2026, on the theme “Towards Viksit Bharat: Innovating, Collaborating and Aspiring to Global Space Leadership”. The landing site is designated Shiv Shakti Point.
Chief Guest was Union Minister for Culture and Tourism Gajendra Singh Shekhawat, with Dr V. Narayanan, Secretary of the Department of Space and Chairman of ISRO, presiding, and IN-SPACe Chairman Dr Pawan Kumar Goenka participating. The Chairman said more than 440 space start-ups have emerged since the 2020 reforms, and set out a plan of eight launch vehicle missions and 12 satellites in the current financial year, with the first uncrewed Gaganyaan test flight in about four months.
Those figures are his spoken remarks reported from the event, not a published target document.
🎯 Concept Kit tap to expand
| 🔗 Cross-Paper Links | GS3 achievements of Indians in science and technology; space sector reforms. |
| ✍️ Mains Keywords | launch cadence, in-situ resource utilisation, single-window authorisation, first-mover advantage. |
| ⚠️ Common Mistake | claiming India was the first to soft-land on the Moon. It was the fourth to soft-land and the first near the south pole. |
| 📌 Exam Tip | the Bharatiya Antariksh Station target year is 2035. |
| 🎤 Interview | ** Is India’s space constraint now capability or cadence? |
Question 2 of 15
Facts
IN-SPACe, the Indian National Space Promotion and Authorisation Centre, is the single-window authorisation and promotion body created under the 2020 reforms.
Analysis
The three bodies are routinely confused. NSIL is ISRO’s commercial arm; ANTRIX was the earlier commercial arm; the Department of Space is the parent department. IN-SPACe is the regulator-promoter, and it is the one that authorises private activity.
Concept note
IN-SPACe is chaired by Dr Pawan Kumar Goenka. ISRO is chaired by Dr V. Narayanan, who is also Secretary of the Department of Space, so the same individual holds both the departmental and agency roles.
More than 440 space start-ups have emerged since the 2020 reforms, though a start-up count is an input measure rather than an output one, and the number that have actually reached orbit is much smaller. Skyroot Aerospace’s Vikram-1 achieved orbital success earlier in 2026 and the team was felicitated at the National Space Day event.
🎯 Concept Kit tap to expand
| 🔗 Cross-Paper Links | GS3 science and technology; GS2 regulatory bodies. |
| ✍️ Mains Keywords | single-window authorisation, second launch pathway, supplier base, flight heritage. |
| ⚠️ Common Mistake | treating NSIL and IN-SPACe as interchangeable. NSIL sells; IN-SPACe authorises. |
| 📌 Exam Tip | the Space Applications Centre at Ahmedabad handles payloads and applications, which is why it hosted the event. |
| 🎤 Interview | ** Have the 2020 reforms created a genuine second launch pathway, or a supplier base still dependent on ISRO? |
Question 3 of 15
Facts
Both 1996 judgments, Indian Council for Enviro-Legal Action v. Union of India and Vellore Citizens’ Welfare Forum v. Union of India, read the Polluter Pays Principle and the Precautionary Principle into Article 21 as elements of sustainable development.
Analysis
The distractors are all real environmental or constitutional cases, which is what makes the question test recall rather than recognition. MC Mehta established absolute liability; Subhash Kumar read the right to a clean environment into Article 21.
Concept note
The Supreme Court applied this framework on 22 August 2026 in Vyakti Vikas Kendra India v. Manoj Misra (Dead) and Others, 2026 INSC 910, decided by Justices Satish Chandra Sharma and N. Kotiswar Singh. The Court set aside the National Green Tribunal’s 2017 order that had imposed Rs 5 crore on the Art of Living Foundation for damage to the Yamuna floodplains from the 2016 World Culture Festival, and directed the Delhi Development Authority to refund the amount within four weeks.
It held that the principle “cannot be invoked unless the degradation is attributable to the alleged person”, and found the site was already dilapidated before it was handed over.
🎯 Concept Kit tap to expand
| 🔗 Cross-Paper Links | GS3 environmental jurisprudence; GS2 judiciary and tribunals. |
| ✍️ Mains Keywords | attribution, evidentiary baseline, sustainable development, diffuse harm. |
| ⚠️ Common Mistake | treating the Polluter Pays Principle as automatic. This judgment holds causation is a precondition. |
| 📌 Exam Tip | rehabilitation is not restoration; the Court held requiring full restoration exceeded the appellant’s liability, while the DDA’s own duty continues. |
| 🎤 Interview | ** Can a strict causation standard survive in degraded urban floodplains where no single actor can be isolated? |
Question 4 of 15
Facts
Section 22 of the National Green Tribunal Act, 2010 provides the statutory appeal from an NGT order to the Supreme Court.
Analysis
Article 136 special leave exists in parallel as a discretionary constitutional remedy, but the question asks for the route the statute provides, and a statutory appeal does not depend on the Court granting leave.
Concept note
The NGT was created by the National Green Tribunal Act, 2010 and has jurisdiction over seven scheduled environmental statutes. In the August 2026 Yamuna floodplain ruling, the Supreme Court criticised the Tribunal for reaching its conclusion without examining contemporaneous evidence of the pre-existing state of the floodplain, relying instead on an expert report the Court described as sweeping and based on the members’ subjective assessment.
That institutional criticism, about the standard of fact-finding expected of a specialised body, is arguably the stronger half of the judgment.
🎯 Concept Kit tap to expand
| 🔗 Cross-Paper Links | GS2 tribunals and judicial review; GS3 environmental governance. |
| ✍️ Mains Keywords | expert fact-finding, evidentiary baseline, specialised tribunals, standard of proof. |
| ⚠️ Common Mistake | assuming all tribunal appeals run through Article 136. Many statutes provide a direct appeal. |
| 📌 Exam Tip | the NGT covers seven scheduled Acts, not all environmental law. |
| 🎤 Interview | ** Should the NGT be required to establish a baseline before quantifying compensation? |
Question 5 of 15
Facts
An FCNR(B) deposit is denominated in foreign currency, so the depositor bears no rupee exchange risk. Under a special swap facility the RBI offers banks concessional forward cover, which moves that risk onto the central bank.
Analysis
The risk does not disappear, it is transferred and subsidised. That is precisely what makes these instruments attractive to depositors and costly to the issuer.
Concept note
On 24 August 2026 the Government announced that the RBI special USD-INR swap facility, launched on 8 June 2026 and covering FCNR(B) deposits, Overseas Foreign Currency Borrowings and External Commercial Borrowings, had mobilised USD 73 billion as on 21 August 2026, of which FCNR(B) deposits alone were USD 65.40 billion. The FCNR(B) window closure was advanced from 30 September to 31 August 2026.
For comparison, the 2013 FCNR(B) swap during the taper tantrum raised about USD 26 billion over roughly three months. Note that the USD 73 billion is an interim figure with days still to run, not a final total.
🎯 Concept Kit tap to expand
| 🔗 Cross-Paper Links | GS3 mobilisation of resources, external sector, balance of payments. |
| ✍️ Mains Keywords | maturity bunching, redemption cliff, forward cover subsidy, capital account management. |
| ⚠️ Common Mistake | confusing FCNR(B) with NRE or NRO accounts. NRE and NRO are rupee-denominated and the depositor carries the exchange risk; FCNR(B) is foreign-currency denominated and the depositor does not. |
| 📌 Exam Tip | ECBs are regulated by the RBI under FEMA, 1999. |
| 🎤 Interview | ** Is reaching for a crisis instrument a statement about diaspora confidence or about external vulnerability? |
Question 6 of 15
Facts
The 500 GW non-fossil capacity target for 2030 was announced as part of the Panchamrit, the five-point commitment set out at COP26 in Glasgow.
Analysis
COP21 produced the Paris Agreement and India’s original NDC, but the specific 500 GW figure belongs to the Panchamrit. India’s updated NDC separately targets 50 per cent of cumulative installed capacity from non-fossil sources by 2030, which is a different metric from the absolute GW figure.
Concept note
MNRE announced on 24 August 2026, at the first regional roadshow for the Bharat Renewable Energy Summit at Jaipur, that non-fossil capacity had reached 300.50 GW as of 31 July 2026, securing over 60 per cent of the 500 GW target. Note the dates carefully: the milestone is dated 31 July and only the announcement falls on 24 August.
The BRE Summit runs 2 to 5 November 2026 at Bharat Mandapam, New Delhi, alongside the 9th ISA Assembly and the 4th International Conference on Green Hydrogen. The International Solar Alliance is headquartered at Gurugram and was jointly launched by India and France at COP21.
🎯 Concept Kit tap to expand
| 🔗 Cross-Paper Links | GS3 environment, energy infrastructure, India’s NDCs. |
| ✍️ Mains Keywords | capacity utilisation factor, evacuation constraint, firming, discom solvency. |
| ⚠️ Common Mistake | attributing the 500 GW figure to the Paris Agreement rather than to the Panchamrit at COP26. |
| 📌 Exam Tip | the ISA is headquartered at Gurugram, Haryana. |
| 🎤 Interview | ** Has India’s energy transition become a systems problem rather than a capacity problem? |
Question 7 of 15
Facts
Capacity utilisation factor is the ratio of actual output to the theoretical maximum. Solar and wind have low factors because they generate only when the resource is available; coal plants run at much higher factors.
Analysis
This is why installed capacity share and generation share diverge sharply, and it is one of the most common errors in writing about India’s energy transition.
Concept note
The official release announcing 300.50 GW stated that this “accounts for over 54 per cent of India’s total electricity generation”. That sentence conflates installed capacity share with generation share and should not be reproduced.
Coal still supplies roughly three-quarters of India’s electricity generation. The binding constraints on the transition have moved downstream to transmission and evacuation capacity, round-the-clock firming, storage economics and the financial health of distribution companies.
Rajasthan’s shift toward wind-solar hybrids, battery storage and green hydrogen, described at the same roadshow, is a response to exactly those constraints.
🎯 Concept Kit tap to expand
| 🔗 Cross-Paper Links | GS3 energy infrastructure and climate policy. |
| ✍️ Mains Keywords | capacity utilisation factor, round-the-clock power, storage economics, evacuation. |
| ⚠️ Common Mistake | reporting a capacity share as a generation share. Official releases sometimes make this error, so check which is being measured. |
| 📌 Exam Tip | non-fossil capacity includes large hydro and nuclear, which are firm, alongside variable solar and wind, so composition matters as much as the total. |
| 🎤 Interview | ** Should India tender for storage and round-the-clock power rather than for raw capacity? |
Question 8 of 15
Facts
The CBD, adopted in 1992, has three objectives: conservation, sustainable use, and the fair and equitable sharing of benefits arising from the use of genetic resources. ABS implements the third.
Analysis
Option D describes the domain of the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety, a separate instrument, which is why it is the strongest distractor for a candidate who half-knows the framework.
Concept note
ABS was operationalised internationally by the Nagoya Protocol, adopted in 2010 and in force from 2014, to which India is a party. On 22 August 2026 the National Biodiversity Authority disbursed Rs 2.82 crore in ABS funds, of which Rs 2.80 crore went to 27 State Biodiversity Boards and 3 Union Territory Biodiversity Councils and Rs 2.01 lakh to ICAR-Indian Institute of Horticultural Research, Bengaluru.
The funds came from Advanta Enterprises Ltd, formerly UPL Limited, for genetic resources associated with eight hybrids of cauliflower and five of hot pepper. Because the resources were accessed through a corporate acquisition, the original benefit claimers could not be traced, and an Expert Committee modality was used to distribute the money instead.
🎯 Concept Kit tap to expand
| 🔗 Cross-Paper Links | GS3 biodiversity conservation and international environmental agreements. |
| ✍️ Mains Keywords | benefit claimer, traceability, bioprospecting, People’s Biodiversity Registers. |
| ⚠️ Common Mistake | attributing biosafety and living modified organisms to the Nagoya Protocol. That is Cartagena. |
| 📌 Exam Tip | a "benefit claimer" under the 2002 Act is a conserver of biological resources or a holder of associated traditional knowledge. |
| 🎤 Interview | ** When benefit-sharing money reaches government boards rather than communities, is ABS still an equity mechanism or has it become a levy? |
Question 9 of 15
Facts
The Act creates the National Biodiversity Authority at the national level, State Biodiversity Boards at state level, and Biodiversity Management Committees at local body level.
Analysis
Option C is the parallel structure under the Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972, and option B mixes bodies from three different statutes. Knowing which statute creates which body is the actual test.
Concept note
The NBA is a statutory autonomous body established in 2003, headquartered at Chennai, under the Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change. The Act was amended by the Biological Diversity (Amendment) Act, 2023, which eased compliance for Indian companies and registered AYUSH practitioners.
Biodiversity Management Committees maintain People’s Biodiversity Registers, which are the local evidentiary base for benefit claims, and which matter precisely in cases like the August 2026 disbursal where provenance was otherwise lost through a corporate acquisition.
🎯 Concept Kit tap to expand
| 🔗 Cross-Paper Links | GS3 biodiversity governance; GS2 statutory bodies and federal structures. |
| ✍️ Mains Keywords | three-tier governance, provenance, traceability, decentralised conservation. |
| ⚠️ Common Mistake | confusing State Biodiversity Boards with State Pollution Control Boards, which are created by the Water and Air Acts. |
| 📌 Exam Tip | the NBA is at Chennai; the National Green Tribunal’s principal bench is at New Delhi. |
| 🎤 Interview | ** Should genetic-resource provenance records be required to transfer with the asset in a corporate acquisition? |
Question 10 of 15
Facts
The Multi Agency Centre operates under the Intelligence Bureau.
Analysis
The distractors are all real security bodies with adjacent functions, which is the point. R&AW handles external intelligence, the NIA investigates and prosecutes, and the NSCS advises. MAC exists to pool inputs across agencies that would otherwise hold them separately.
Concept note
MAC originated in the recommendations following the Kargil Review Committee and the associated Group of Ministers process, and was substantially strengthened after the 26/11 Mumbai attacks. At the 9th National Security Strategies Conference on 24 August 2026, Union Home Minister Amit Shah directed that AI-based analysis of information on MAC platforms be used to create standard operating procedures.
The conference was held in hybrid format with over 850 participants and has run annually in that format since 2021. Day-two themes included sub-aerial systems, blue economy security, information warfare and a bio-security framework.
🎯 Concept Kit tap to expand
| 🔗 Cross-Paper Links | GS3 internal security, security agencies and their mandate. |
| ✍️ Mains Keywords | intelligence fusion, algorithmic triage, error propagation, oversight vacuum. |
| ⚠️ Common Mistake | attributing MAC to R&AW. R&AW is external; MAC sits under the IB. |
| 📌 Exam Tip | India has no comprehensive intelligence-oversight legislation, which is the gap that makes AI analysis over fused intelligence a live governance question. |
| 🎤 Interview | ** Who is accountable when an AI-generated SOP built on fused intelligence turns out to be wrong? |
Question 11 of 15
Facts
Trial in absentia for proclaimed absconders is a provision of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, and is new.
Analysis
Option C is the strongest distractor precisely because it is wrong in an instructive way: the old CrPC contained no such provision, which is why this is cited as one of the substantive changes in the new criminal codes rather than a renumbering.
Concept note
At the 9th National Security Strategies Conference on 24 August 2026, the Home Minister directed that trials be expedited by bringing back fugitives and by using trial in absentia provisions, alongside an integrated approach to UAPA investigations. The UAPA dates from 1967 and was amended in 2019 to permit the designation of individuals, not only organisations, as terrorists.
Trial in absentia is an efficiency gain against absconders who have placed themselves beyond process, but it sits in tension with fair-trial guarantees under Article 21, and the safeguards that matter are adequate notice, mandatory legal representation and a right to seek retrial on return.
🎯 Concept Kit tap to expand
| 🔗 Cross-Paper Links | GS2 criminal justice reform and fundamental rights; GS3 internal security. |
| ✍️ Mains Keywords | fair trial, natural justice, absconder, procedural safeguard. |
| ⚠️ Common Mistake | assuming the three new criminal codes merely renumbered the old ones. Trial in absentia is genuinely new. |
| 📌 Exam Tip | the UAPA’s 2019 amendment allows individuals to be designated terrorists, which was the significant change. |
| 🎤 Interview | ** What safeguards make trial in absentia compatible with Article 21? |
Question 12 of 15
Facts
The 14th BRICS Science, Technology and Innovation Ministerial, held at Chennai, adopted the Chennai Declaration, also styled the Chennai Consensus, by consensus on 22 August 2026.
Analysis
Note the verb. A declaration is adopted, not ratified, and is politically binding at most. Describing it as a treaty or as legally binding would be wrong.
Concept note
The Declaration welcomes the Action Plan and Terms of Reference of the Task Force under the Working Group on Research Infrastructures and Mega-science Projects, records progress toward operationalising the BRICS Global Research Advanced Infrastructure Network (BRICS GRAIN), welcomes a BRICS Science and Research Repository as a digital public good, and endorses the STI Calendar for 2026-27. Note that GRAIN is recorded as progress toward operationalising, meaning it is not yet operational.
India’s BRICS chairship theme for 2026 is “Building for Resilience, Innovation, Cooperation and Sustainability”, and the STI Ministerial process passes to China’s chairship in 2027.
🎯 Concept Kit tap to expand
| 🔗 Cross-Paper Links | GS2 regional and global groupings involving India; GS3 international scientific collaboration. |
| ✍️ Mains Keywords | mega-science infrastructure, researcher mobility, Global South signalling, asymmetric partnership. |
| ⚠️ Common Mistake | treating an adopted declaration as legally binding. |
| 📌 Exam Tip | the institutional record cited includes 14 thematic Working Groups, 11 Young Scientist Forum editions and 9 STI Framework Programme calls. |
| 🎤 Interview | ** Can scientific cooperation produce joint capability among states that are also technological competitors? |
Question 13 of 15
Facts
The BRICS Sports Ministers’ Meeting 2026 concluded at Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh on 23 August 2026.
Analysis
The distractors are all cities named in the same announcement for different purposes, which is the trap. Udaipur is the proposed host for the Sports Manufacturing Conclave, Ahmedabad for the Traditional Games, and Chennai hosted the separate Science and Technology Ministerial.
Concept note
The meeting adopted the BRICS Sports Joint Declaration by consensus. Union Minister for Youth Affairs and Sports Dr Mansukh Mandaviya advanced three initiatives: a BRICS Working Group on Sports Technology, a BRICS Sports Manufacturing Conclave proposed for Udaipur in November 2026, and BRICS Traditional and Indigenous Sports Demonstration Games proposed for Ahmedabad on 12 and 13 October 2026 in a non-competitive format.
He also referred to a forthcoming scheme for Sports Goods Manufacturing Clusters. Record the Conclave, the Games and the clusters scheme as proposals or forthcoming, not as fixtures held or schemes launched.
🎯 Concept Kit tap to expand
| 🔗 Cross-Paper Links | GS2 regional groupings and chairship agenda-setting; GS1 soft power. |
| ✍️ Mains Keywords | sports diplomacy, cluster industry, quality certification, supply-chain share. |
| ⚠️ Common Mistake | writing proposed events as scheduled fixtures. |
| 📌 Exam Tip | India’s sports goods manufacturing clusters are at Meerut and Jalandhar, and are MSME-heavy and export-oriented. |
| 🎤 Interview | ** Does hosting conclaves convert into manufacturing share, or is the binding constraint certification and scale? |
Question 14 of 15
Facts
India-Cambodia bilateral trade of USD 406.78 million in 2025-26 was about 0.31 per cent of India’s total trade with ASEAN, even though Cambodia ranks as India’s 8th largest ASEAN trading partner.
Analysis
The gap between rank and share is the point. Being 8th of ten in a bloc where trade is concentrated in a few partners is compatible with a very small absolute share.
Concept note
The Third India-Cambodia Joint Working Group on Trade and Investment met at Phnom Penh on 24 August 2026. Trade grew over 36 per cent from USD 299 million, with 63.25 per cent year-on-year growth in the April to June 2026 quarter.
The meeting welcomed the launch of UPI acceptance at KHQR-enabled merchants in Phnom Penh on 2 June 2026; KHQR is Cambodia’s national QR standard run by the National Bank of Cambodia through the Bakong system. The reverse leg, allowing Cambodian apps to scan UPI QR codes in India, is under discussion and not yet live.
An MoU on Customs Cooperation and a Bilateral Investment Treaty were discussed but neither has been signed.
🎯 Concept Kit tap to expand
| 🔗 Cross-Paper Links | GS2 India and its neighbourhood, India-ASEAN relations, Act East Policy. |
| ✍️ Mains Keywords | digital public infrastructure diplomacy, connectivity without capital, investor protection, complementarity. |
| ⚠️ Common Mistake | reading a high growth rate off a small base as evidence of depth. |
| 📌 Exam Tip | Cambodia joined ASEAN in 1999, the last of the ten members. |
| 🎤 Interview | ** Can exporting digital public infrastructure substitute for trade and investment depth, or only supplement it? |
Question 15 of 15
Facts
Chang’e-7 comprises an orbiter, a lander, a rover and a hopper.
Analysis
The hopper is the distinguishing element and the reason the mission targets the south pole: a hopping vehicle can enter permanently shadowed craters that a wheeled rover cannot, which is where water ice is suspected to be.
Concept note
The mission launched from the Wenchang Spacecraft Launch Site, Hainan, aboard a Long March-5 (Y14), targeting a landing near Shackleton crater. It is an explicit precursor to China’s planned crewed lunar landing, targeted for 2030, and carries international payloads including a Russian dust-detection instrument, an Italian laser retroreflector, a Bahrain and Egypt developed camera, a Thai-Chinese high-energy particle instrument and a Swiss dual-channel Earth radiation spectrometer.
The launch fell the day after India observed National Space Day, which marks the Chandrayaan-3 landing in the same polar region.
🎯 Concept Kit tap to expand
| 🔗 Cross-Paper Links | GS3 space technology and comparative lunar exploration; GS2 space diplomacy. |
| ✍️ Mains Keywords | in-situ resource utilisation, permanently shadowed regions, instrument-sharing, first-mover credibility. |
| ⚠️ Common Mistake | treating any lunar south pole mission as a repeat of Chandrayaan-3. The scientific target is water ice, and the instrument suites differ. |
| 📌 Exam Tip | India’s follow-on is LUPEX, the India-Japan Lunar Polar Exploration Mission, aimed at water-ice prospecting. |
| 🎤 Interview | ** Does a first landing confer any durable advantage if follow-on missions lag? |
Performance
Question-wise Result