UPSC Prelims Practice
Current Affairs Quiz 10 October 2026
Test Your Knowledge
8 questions based on today’s current affairs & editorials
Choose number of questions
Question 1 of 8
1 Article 16(3) enables Parliament to prescribe a requirement as to residence within a State or Union territory for certain classes of employment or appointment.
2 The text of the Constitution does not refer to a ceiling of fifty per cent on reservation anywhere.
3 Article 16(6) allows reservation for economically weaker sections in addition to the existing reservation, subject to a maximum of ten per cent of the posts in each category.
4 In Indra Sawhney, the Supreme Court held that the fifty per cent rule may be relaxed in extraordinary situations, such as for people in far-flung and remote areas, with extreme caution.
How many of the above statements are correct?
Facts
Statement 1Correct
Article 16(3) lets Parliament make a law prescribing a requirement as to residence within a State or Union territory prior to employment or appointment.
Statement 2Incorrect
Article 16(4B) keeps carried-forward reserved vacancies out of the year’s count ‘for determining the ceiling of fifty per cent. reservation on total number of vacancies of that year’.
Statement 3Correct
That is the wording of Article 16(6).
Statement 4Correct
Para 810 says 50% shall be the rule, but relaxation may become imperative in extraordinary situations, such as far-flung and remote areas, with extreme caution and a special case made out.
Analysis
On 9 October 2026 the Madhya Pradesh High Court struck down the State’s 27% OBC quota, finding no extraordinary conditions under para 810.
Concept note
Article 16(4) lets the State reserve appointments or posts for any backward class of citizens which, in its opinion, is not adequately represented in the services under the State. The clause sets no number.
The fifty per cent limit comes from Indra Sawhney (1992 Supp (3) SCC 217): para 809 says reservations under Article 16(4) ‘should not exceed 50%’, and para 810 allows relaxation only in extraordinary situations. The text of the Constitution refers to the ceiling in Article 16(4B), which keeps carried-forward vacancies out of the count, and Article 16(6) adds an EWS quota of up to ten per cent ‘in addition to the existing reservation’.
On 9 October 2026 the Madhya Pradesh High Court declared the State’s 27% OBC quota contrary to the 50% ceiling and held OBCs entitled to 14% in public services and higher education. It said ‘This case is not about grant of reservation but extent of reservation’.
The same day, as The Hindu reported, the Supreme Court upheld the Andhra Pradesh High Court’s 1 October verdict that the State had failed to produce the empirical data needed to breach the ceiling.
🎯 Concept Kit tap to expand
| 🔗 Cross-Paper Links | ** GS2 (fundamental rights, judiciary, federalism); GS1 (social justice, backward classes). ** |
| ✍️ Mains Keywords | ** adequacy of representation, empirical data, extraordinary situations, equality of opportunity. ** |
| ⚠️ Common Mistake | ** Citing Article 16(3), which is about residence, for OBC quotas; the reservation power is Article 16(4). ** |
| 📌 Exam Tip | ** 16(3) residence (Parliament); 16(4) backward classes; 16(4B) carried-forward vacancies outside the 50% count; 16(6) EWS up to ten per cent. ** |
| 🎤 Interview | ** Should the fifty per cent ceiling stay judge-made, or should Parliament settle it in the Constitution? |
Question 2 of 8
1 The International Criminal Court is governed by the Rome Statute and is the world’s first permanent international criminal court.
2 The International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda was created by a treaty negotiated among States, like the International Criminal Court.
3 The International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda is located in Kigali, Rwanda.
4 In The Gambia v. Myanmar, the International Court of Justice found that it has jurisdiction on the basis of Article IX of the Genocide Convention.
How many of the above statements are correct?
Facts
Statement 1Correct
The ICC is governed by an international treaty called the Rome Statute and is the world’s first permanent international criminal court.
Statement 2Incorrect
The United Nations Security Council established the ICTR, to prosecute genocide and other serious violations of international humanitarian law committed in Rwanda and neighbouring States between 1 January and 31 December 1994.
Statement 3Incorrect
The ICTR is located in Arusha, Tanzania; it has offices in Kigali, and its Appeals Chamber is in The Hague.
Statement 4Correct
In July 2022 the ICJ found jurisdiction, on the basis of Article IX of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide, to entertain The Gambia’s application of 11 November 2019.
Analysis
Navi Pillay, named for the Nobel Peace Prize 2026 on 9 October, served as a judge of the ICTR and the ICC and now sits as The Gambia’s judge ad hoc at the ICJ in this case.
Concept note
Three kinds of court sit behind this year’s Nobel Peace Prize. The ICTR was created by the UN Security Council for genocide and other serious violations of international humanitarian law committed in Rwanda and neighbouring States in 1994, and is located in Arusha, Tanzania.
The prize announcement says that when the ICTR established that rape and sexual violence could constitute a crime against humanity, as well as genocide, Pillay’s influence was a significant factor. The ICC is permanent and treaty-based: the Rome Statute was adopted on 17 July 1998, and as a court of last resort the ICC seeks to complement, not replace, national courts.
The ICJ hears cases between States: The Gambia against Myanmar under the Genocide Convention, with public hearings on the merits from 12 to 29 January 2026. Navanethem ‘Navi’ Pillay, born into a family of Indian Tamil origin in Durban, South Africa, has been a judge of the High Court in South Africa, the ICTR and the ICC, and was the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights.
The Norwegian Nobel Committee honoured her ‘for her efforts to promote peace and international law’.
🎯 Concept Kit tap to expand
| 🔗 Cross-Paper Links | ** GS2 (international institutions, global governance); GS4 (justice, accountability). ** |
| ✍️ Mains Keywords | ** international criminal justice, complementarity, accountability, rules-based order. ** |
| ⚠️ Common Mistake | ** Placing the ICTR in Kigali; it is located in Arusha, Tanzania, with offices in Kigali. ** |
| 📌 Exam Tip | ** ICTR = set up by the UN Security Council for crimes of 1994; ICC = Rome Statute (17 July 1998), permanent; ICJ = cases between States, such as The Gambia v. Myanmar. ** |
| 🎤 Interview | ** Can international courts deliver justice when the States that must cooperate with them refuse to? |
Question 3 of 8
Statement-I: A scheduled bank may hold less than its required Cash Reserve Ratio (CRR) balance on a given day, provided it meets a daily minimum and its average of CRR maintained daily over the reporting fortnight is not less than the CRR prescribed.
Statement-II: An increase in the minimum daily CRR maintenance requirement raises the CRR that a bank must maintain on average over the fortnight.
Which one of the following is correct in respect of the above statements?
Facts
Statement ICorrect
The RBI’s circular under section 42(1) of the Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934 allows scheduled banks to keep a minimum CRR of not less than a set share of the required CRR on all days of the reporting fortnight, so long as the average of CRR maintained daily is not less than the CRR prescribed.
Statement IIIncorrect
The change raises only the daily floor, from 90 per cent of the requirement to 99 per cent, effective from the fortnight beginning 16 October 2026; the averaging rule stays and the circular does not change the CRR prescribed.
Analysis
A higher daily floor leaves banks less room to run down reserves on any one day, so it tightens day-to-day liquidity management without touching the ratio.
Concept note
The circular of 9 October 2026 is addressed to all scheduled banks and issued under section 42(1) of the Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934. Until now banks could keep, on any day of the reporting fortnight, not less than 90 per cent of the required CRR, provided the average of CRR maintained daily was not less than the CRR prescribed.
From the fortnight beginning 16 October 2026 the daily floor will be 99 per cent. The RBI gave its reason in one line: ‘On a review of the current liquidity conditions’.
On 7 October the Monetary Policy Committee raised the policy repo rate by 25 basis points to 5.50 per cent. On 10 October the RBI created a Foreign Exchange Risk Reserve of 20 per cent of the notional amount on certain rupee hedges above USD two million, kept as cash with the Reserve Bank, and barred the rebooking of cancelled foreign exchange derivative contracts.
For Prelims, keep the two CRR ideas apart: the CRR is the ratio a bank must maintain on average over the fortnight; the daily minimum is the share of it that must be held every single day. Only the second has moved.
🎯 Concept Kit tap to expand
| 🔗 Cross-Paper Links | ** GS3 (monetary policy, banking, liquidity management, external sector). ** |
| ✍️ Mains Keywords | ** liquidity management, monetary transmission, reserve requirements, calibrated tightening. ** |
| ⚠️ Common Mistake | ** Reading the move from 90 to 99 per cent as a rise in the CRR itself; it is a rise in the daily floor only. ** |
| 📌 Exam Tip | ** The CRR circular rests on section 42(1) of the RBI Act, 1934, binds scheduled banks and is met on a fortnightly average, subject to a daily minimum. ** |
| 🎤 Interview | ** Why might a central bank tighten the daily CRR floor rather than raise the CRR itself? |
Question 4 of 8
1 The National Testing Agency was set up as a society registered under the Societies Registration Act, 1860.
2 The Public Examinations (Prevention of Unfair Means) Act, 2024 applies to examinations conducted by the Union Public Service Commission, the Staff Selection Commission, the Railway Recruitment Boards, the Institute of Banking Personnel Selection and the National Testing Agency.
3 The Public Examinations (Prevention of Unfair Means) Act, 2024 came into force on the day it was enacted.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
Facts
Statement 1Correct
The Union Cabinet approved the NTA in November 2017 as a Society registered under the Societies Registration Act, 1860, an autonomous and self-sustained testing organisation, whose CEO is a Director General appointed by the Government.
Statement 2Correct
The Act covers examinations by the UPSC, SSC, RRBs, IBPS and NTA, and by Central ministries and departments for recruitment, among others.
Statement 3Incorrect
The Act was enacted on 12 February 2024 but came into force only on 21 June 2024.
Analysis
The 382nd report of the Department-related Parliamentary Standing Committee on Education, Women, Children, Youth and Sports notes that NEET-UG ‘is an outlier in its reliance on pen-and-paper testing’ and recommends moving it to computer-based testing.
Concept note
The NTA was approved by the Union Cabinet on 10 November 2017 as a registered society and an autonomous, self-sustained premier testing organisation for entrance examinations. Its CEO is the Director General, appointed by the Government.
It conducts JEE-Mains, NEET-UG, UGC-NET and CUET among others. The Public Examinations (Prevention of Unfair Means) Act, 2024 was enacted on 12 February 2024 and came into force on 21 June 2024.
It covers examinations by the UPSC, SSC, RRBs, IBPS, the NTA and Central ministries and departments for recruitment, and any other authority the Centre notifies. Parliament has since raised its penalties through the Public Examinations (Prevention of Unfair Means) Amendment Act, 2026 (Act No. 10 of 2026), which received the President’s assent on 31 July 2026.
The Standing Committee’s 382nd report notes that JEE-Mains, UGC-NET and CUET already run on computer-based testing and recommends that NEET move to it too. It also wants a National Registry of Blacklisted Examination Vendors, publicly accessible online, and asks the Ministry to explore reasonable age and attempt limits, since NEET (UG) at present has no limit on attempts and no real upper age limit.
🎯 Concept Kit tap to expand
| 🔗 Cross-Paper Links | ** GS2 (education, parliamentary committees, statutory and non-statutory bodies). ** |
| ✍️ Mains Keywords | ** examination integrity, computer-based testing, institutional accountability, public trust. ** |
| ⚠️ Common Mistake | ** Calling the NTA a statutory body; it was set up as a registered society. ** |
| 📌 Exam Tip | ** Public Examinations (Prevention of Unfair Means) Act, 2024: enacted 12 February 2024, in force from 21 June 2024; penalties raised by the 2026 Amendment Act. ** |
| 🎤 Interview | ** Should NEET-UG move to computer-based testing if that swaps a printing-press risk for a hacking risk? |
Question 5 of 8
1. ASTR : Citizen participation in reporting suspected fraud
2. Sanchar Saathi : Intelligence sharing among over 1,600 organisations, including banks and law-enforcement agencies
3. Digital Intelligence Platform : AI-based identification of fraudulent mobile connections
How many of the pairs given above are correctly matched?
Facts
Pair 1Incorrect
ASTR is the AI-based tool for identifying fraudulent mobile connections; citizen participation runs through Sanchar Saathi.
Pair 2Incorrect
Intelligence sharing runs through the Digital Intelligence Platform (DIP), which connects over 1,600 organisations, including telecom operators, banks and law-enforcement agencies.
Pair 3Incorrect
Identifying fraudulent connections with AI is the job of ASTR, not of the DIP.
Analysis
The Union Minister of State for Communications set out this layered approach at an ITU roundtable and welcomed ITU’s proposal for joint trials, backing ITU standards for digital verification of caller identity across international networks.
Concept note
India’s approach to fraudulent communications has five layers: real-time blocking of spoofed international calls; identification of fraudulent mobile connections through C-DOT’s AI-based ASTR tool; citizen participation through Sanchar Saathi; intelligence sharing through the Digital Intelligence Platform; and measures addressing emerging fraud channels. The figures cited for each: ASTR has helped disconnect over 82 lakh fraudulent connections, the Sanchar Saathi app has recorded around 25 million downloads, and the DIP connects over 1,600 organisations.
The Financial Fraud Risk Indicator has helped prevent suspected financial losses exceeding ₹5,000 crore in 15 months. Indians lost over ₹22,800 crore to such fraud in 2024.
Because fraud now crosses borders, through impersonation, digital arrest scams, AI-generated voice cloning and deepfakes, India backed ITU standards for digital verification of caller identity across international networks and suggested beginning trials between willing countries on selected international routes. In the Minister’s words, 'Fraud is a network problem.
It needs a network answer.’
🎯 Concept Kit tap to expand
| 🔗 Cross-Paper Links | ** GS3 (cyber security, internal security, communication networks); GS2 (international cooperation, ITU). ** |
| ✍️ Mains Keywords | ** layered defence, caller identity verification, digital trust, cross-border fraud. ** |
| ⚠️ Common Mistake | ** Swapping ASTR, which identifies fraudulent connections, with the DIP, which shares intelligence. ** |
| 📌 Exam Tip | ** ASTR = AI-based detection of fraudulent connections; Sanchar Saathi = citizen participation; DIP = intelligence sharing across 1,600+ organisations. ** |
| 🎤 Interview | ** Can national telecom rules stop cross-border scams without common global standards? |
Question 6 of 8
1 Under the Manual on Electoral Rolls, 2023, claims and objections presented in bulk by an individual should not be entertained.
2 Under the Registration of Electors Rules, 1960, a claim or objection not lodged within the specified period or in the specified form and manner shall be rejected by the Electoral Registration Officer.
3 Form 7 is the application used to seek the inclusion of a new elector’s name in the electoral roll.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
Facts
Statement 1Correct
Para 11.3.2(ii) of the Manual provides that claims and objections presented in bulk, including those sent by post, by an individual should not be entertained, and provides for personal cross-verification by the ERO where the same person is the objector in more than five cases.
Statement 2Correct
Under the Registration of Electors Rules, 1960, any claim or objection not lodged within the period or in the form and manner specified in the rules shall be rejected by the ERO.
Statement 3Incorrect
Form 7 carries objections seeking the deletion of voter names and is signed by the objector; the new cap targets bulk Form 7s seeking deletions.
Analysis
The Election Commission has capped Form 7s at 10 per elector during the period of claims and objections and five a month during continuous updation, for online and physical forms alike.
Concept note
The Election Commission of India capped the number of Form 7s a voter can submit, to contain bulk applications seeking the deletion of voter names during the special intensive revision (SIR) in many States. An individual elector may file at most 10 during the period of claims and objections and five a month during the continuous updation of rolls, and the cap applies to both online and physical forms.
Until now there was no limit on physical Form 7s. Booth-level agents of recognised political parties may still file in bulk during the SIR, but not more than 50 forms a day before the draft roll is published and 10 a day after it.
For an individual elector, applications are filed as per para 11.3.2(ii) of the Manual on Electoral Rolls, 2023. The Commission said bulk Form 7s filed by individual voters on unsubstantiated grounds inconvenience the elector objected upon and increase the workload of field-level functionaries.
Its directive asks the ERO to ensure that full details are filled in each Form 7 and that it is signed by the objector, and says the ERO will act against an applicant whose complaint is false or fabricated.
🎯 Concept Kit tap to expand
| 🔗 Cross-Paper Links | ** GS2 (electoral process, Election Commission of India, delegated legislation). ** |
| ✍️ Mains Keywords | ** electoral roll integrity, due process, voter exclusion, administrative safeguards. ** |
| ⚠️ Common Mistake | ** Treating Form 7 as an inclusion form; it carries objections seeking the deletion of a name. ** |
| 📌 Exam Tip | ** Under the Registration of Electors Rules, 1960, a claim or objection not lodged in the specified period, form and manner is rejected by the ERO. ** |
| 🎤 Interview | ** Is capping Form 7 enough to stop mass deletions, or should the objector carry the burden of proof? |
Question 7 of 8
1 It has been built by Cochin Shipyard Limited.
2 Abhay, one of the systems it carries, is a hull-mounted sonar.
3 Maareech, one of the systems it carries, is an advanced torpedo decoy system.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
Facts
Statement 1Correct
Mangrol is the third Anti-Submarine Warfare Shallow Water Craft (ASW-SWC) built by Cochin Shipyard Limited, Kochi.
Statement 2Correct
It is equipped with the Abhay Hull-Mounted Sonar.
Statement 3Correct
It carries the Maareech Advanced Torpedo Decoy System, besides lightweight torpedoes and an indigenous anti-submarine rocket launcher.
Analysis
Built with over 80% indigenous content, Mangrol is set to be commissioned into the Indian Navy on 12 October 2026 at Naval Dockyard, Mumbai.
Concept note
Mangrol is designed to detect and counter underwater threats in coastal and shallow waters, where larger warships face operational limitations. It carries the Abhay hull-mounted sonar, lightweight torpedoes, an indigenous anti-submarine rocket launcher and the Maareech advanced torpedo decoy system.
Three diesel engines with waterjet propulsion give it high manoeuvrability in shallow waters, and it can also undertake underwater surveillance, Low-Intensity Maritime Operations and mine warfare-related tasks. It can operate alongside maritime patrol aircraft, helicopters and other warships to detect and counter submarine threats.
Built with over 80% indigenous content under the Make in India and Aatmanirbhar Bharat initiatives, it marks a step towards self-reliance in defence shipbuilding. The craft is named after Mangrol, a coastal town and prominent fishing harbour in Gujarat’s Junagadh district, and carries forward the legacy of the erstwhile INS Mangrol (M85), a minesweeper that served the Indian Navy until 7 April 2004.
It is the third ASW-SWC from Cochin Shipyard Limited.
🎯 Concept Kit tap to expand
| 🔗 Cross-Paper Links | ** GS3 (defence technology, indigenisation, coastal security). ** |
| ✍️ Mains Keywords | ** self-reliance in defence shipbuilding, anti-submarine warfare, coastal security, Aatmanirbhar Bharat. ** |
| ⚠️ Common Mistake | ** Mixing up Abhay, a hull-mounted sonar, with Maareech, a torpedo decoy system. ** |
| 📌 Exam Tip | ** ASW-SWC = shallow-water anti-submarine craft; Abhay = sonar; Maareech = torpedo decoy; Mangrol = third from Cochin Shipyard. ** |
| 🎤 Interview | ** Why does the Navy need small shallow-water anti-submarine craft when it already operates larger warships? |
Question 8 of 8
Facts
The Trade and Development Report is a report by UNCTAD, the UN Conference on Trade and Development; its 2026 edition was released on 9 October 2026. The World Trade Organization is the tempting distractor because the report’s title mentions trade, but it is not the publisher.
Analysis
Do not confuse the Trade and Development Report with the World Investment Report; UNCTAD publishes both, but they are separate reports, and the greenfield findings in the news come from the Trade and Development Report.
Concept note
UNCTAD’s Trade and Development Report 2026 was released on 9 October 2026. As reported by The Hindu, it finds that greenfield investment, the investment companies make in new ventures in another country, is increasingly going into strategic sectors, whose share of global greenfield investment grew from 16 per cent to 44 per cent between 2020 and 2025.
India drew 5.7 per cent of global greenfield investment over 2020 to 2025, ahead of Malaysia (4 per cent), Indonesia (3.8 per cent) and China (2.8 per cent). Among strategic sectors, AI infrastructure and related technologies drew the largest share, 12.4 per cent of the $845.7 billion of global greenfield investment in the period, followed by the semiconductor value chain (8.1 per cent) and energy transition technologies and services (7.8 per cent).
Strategic investment still concentrates in Europe (28.4 per cent) and North America (28 per cent). UNCTAD warned that ‘The geographic disparity in strategic investment underscores the growing integration challenges for the Global South, especially for the least developed countries.’ For Prelims, remember the publisher and the report’s name.
🎯 Concept Kit tap to expand
| 🔗 Cross-Paper Links | ** GS3 (investment, industrial policy); GS2 (international institutions). ** |
| ✍️ Mains Keywords | ** greenfield investment, strategic sectors, industrial policy, Global South. ** |
| ⚠️ Common Mistake | ** Calling the Trade and Development Report the World Investment Report; UNCTAD publishes both, but they are separate. ** |
| 📌 Exam Tip | ** Trade and Development Report 2026: India 5.7 per cent of global greenfield investment, 2020 to 2025, as reported by The Hindu. ** |
| 🎤 Interview | ** Can India turn its greenfield share into manufacturing jobs while strategic investment concentrates in Europe and North America? |
Performance
Question-wise Result